Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627364›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2022

Mapping the Concept, Content, and Outcome of Family-Based Outdoor Therapy for Children and Adolescents with Mental Health Problems: A Scoping Review.

Tonje H Stea, Miek C Jong, Liv Fegran, Ellen Sejersted, Mats Jong, Sophia L H Wahlgren, Carina R Fernee

Open access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Effect of nature on the mental health and well-being of children and adolescents: meta-review.The British journal of psychiatry : the journal of mental science · 2024
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Tonje H SteaDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-3349-6706
Miek C JongNational Research Center in Complementary and Alternative Medicine (NAFKAM), Department of Community Medicine, UiT, The Arctic University of Norway, 9037 Tromsø, Norway.
Liv FegranDepartment of Health and Nursing Science, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Ellen SejerstedThe Library, University of Agder, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-1538-6121
Mats JongDepartment of Health Sciences, Mid Sweden University, 851 70 Sundsvall, Sweden.ORCID 0000-0002-3907-2197
Sophia L H WahlgrenDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.
Carina R FerneeDepartment of Child and Adolescent Mental Health, Sørlandet Hospital HE, 4604 Kristiansand, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0732-7407
University of Agder · NOMid Sweden University · SESørlandet Sykehus · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Outdoor therapy and family-based therapy are suggested to be promising interventions for the treatment of mental health problems. The aim of the present scoping review was to systematically map the concept, content, and outcome of combining family- and outdoor-based therapy for children and adolescents with mental health problems. The Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA guidelines were applied. Eligible qualitative and quantitative studies were screened, included, and extracted for data. Seven studies were included. Findings from these studies indicated that family-based outdoor therapy programs have a positive impact on family- and peer relationships, adolescent behavior, mental health, self-perceptions (self-concept), school success, social engagement, and delinquency rates. However, participant characteristics, study design, and content and mode of delivery of the interventions varied substantially, hence preventing detailed comparison of outcomes across studies. In addition, most of the studies included few participants and lacked population diversity and comparable control groups. Although important ethical concerns were raised, such as non-voluntary participation in some of the programs, there was a lack of reporting on safety. This review indicates that a combination of family- and outdoor-based therapy may benefit mental health among children and adolescents, but due to the limited number of studies eligible for inclusion and high levels of heterogeneity, it was difficult to draw firm conclusions. Thus, future theory-based studies using robust designs are warranted.

Indexed as

Family TherapyMental HealthAdolescentChildHumansResearch DesignSchoolsadolescentsfamily-based therapymental health problemsoutdoor therapyscoping review

Identifiers

PMID35627364
PMCPMC9141554
OpenAlexW4280489303

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.