Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627292›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Deep Splicer: A CNN Model for Splice Site Prediction in Genetic Sequences.

Elisa Fernandez-Castillo, Liliana Ibeth Barbosa-Santillán, Luis Falcon-Morales, Juan Jaime Sánchez-Escobar

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Role of Optimization in RNA-Protein-Binding Prediction.Current issues in molecular biology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Elisa Fernandez-CastilloSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Guadalajara 45201, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-0460-3509
Liliana Ibeth Barbosa-SantillánSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Guadalajara 45201, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0002-3509-9667
Luis Falcon-MoralesSchool of Engineering and Sciences, Monterrey Institute of Technology and Higher Education, Guadalajara 45201, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0001-8760-5640
Juan Jaime Sánchez-EscobarScience Research Department, Center for Industrial Technical Teaching, Guadalajara 44638, Mexico.ORCID 0000-0003-0368-341X
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Many living organisms have DNA in their cells that is responsible for their biological features. DNA is an organic molecule of two complementary strands of four different nucleotides wound up in a double helix. These nucleotides are adenine (A), thymine (T), guanine (G), and cytosine (C). Genes are DNA sequences containing the information to synthesize proteins. The genes of higher eukaryotic organisms contain coding sequences, known as exons and non-coding sequences, known as introns, which are removed on splice sites after the DNA is transcribed into RNA. Genome annotation is the process of identifying the location of coding regions and determining their function. This process is fundamental for understanding gene structure; however, it is time-consuming and expensive when done by biochemical methods. With technological advances, splice site detection can be done computationally. Although various software tools have been developed to predict splice sites, they need to improve accuracy and reduce false-positive rates. The main goal of this research was to generate Deep Splicer, a deep learning model to identify splice sites in the genomes of humans and other species. This model has good performance metrics and a lower false-positive rate than the currently existing tools. Deep Splicer achieved an accuracy between 93.55% and 99.66% on the genetic sequences of different organisms, while Splice2Deep, another splice site detection tool, had an accuracy between 90.52% and 98.08%. Splice2Deep surpassed Deep Splicer on the accuracy obtained after evaluating

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansDrosophila melanogasterAnimalsDNAHumansNucleotidesSoftwareDNANucleotidesCNNdeep learning modelsgenetic sequencessplice sites

Identifiers

PMID35627292
PMCPMC9141016
OpenAlexW4280597702

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.