ArticleGenes2022
Uneven Levels of 5S and 45S rDNA Site Number and Loci Variations across Wild
Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Comparative cytogenomic characterization of 18 wheat core collection cultivars from six continents using triple-color PLOP-FISH.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026Article
- Cytogenetic diversity of the diploid Korean wild Chrysanthemum (Asteraceae) inferred from genome size variations and chromosomal distributions of 5 S and 18 S rDNAs.BMC plant biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Oligonucleotide Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization: An Efficient Chromosome Painting Method in Plants.Plants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Investigating the Origin and Evolution of PolyploidPlants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ribosomal DNA (rDNA) is an excellent cytogenetic marker owing to its tandem arrangement and high copy numbers. However, comparative studies have focused more on the number of rDNA site variations within the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.