ReviewGenes2022
A Brief History of
Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- A decline in follicle cell function is a major driver ofbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Chromosome movements in meiotic prophase: regulatory mechanisms and biological roles.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- The role of chromosome/kinetochore-driven microtubule generation in Drosophila spindle assembly.Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology · 2025Review
- No transcription, no problem: Protein phosphorylation changes and the transition from oocyte to embryo.Current topics in developmental biology · 2025Review
- Unusual modes of cell and nuclear divisions characterise Drosophila development.Biochemical Society transactions · 2024Review
- A High-Throughput Method for QuantifyingToxics · 2024Article
- Meiosis through three centuries.Chromosoma · 2024Review
- A high-throughput method for quantifyingbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.