Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627141›Full record

ReviewGenes2022

Macrophage Polarization in Atherosclerosis.

Sahar Eshghjoo, Da Mi Kim, Arul Jayaraman, Yuxiang Sun, Robert C Alaniz

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 101 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The M1/M2 Test System for Determining Macrophage Phenotypes.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Novel insights of ferroptosis in atherosclerosis progression.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026
    Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Sahar EshghjooHuffington Center on Aging, Baylor College Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Da Mi KimDepartment of Nutrition, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Arul JayaramanArtie McFerrin Department of Chemical Engineering, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX 77843, USA.
Yuxiang SunDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Bryan, TX 77807, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6656-3733
Robert C AlanizDepartment of Microbial Pathogenesis and Immunology, Texas A&M University Health Science Center, Bryan, TX 77807, USA.
Texas A&M Health Science Center · USTexas A&M University · US

Funding

Modeling and Analysis of the Role of Microbiota Metabolites in T-Cell DifferentiationR01AI110642 · NIAID · TEXAS ENGINEERING EXPERIMENT STATION · PI ALANIZ, ROBERT CHRISTOPHER, HAHN, JUERGEN · 2015 to 2019
$2.0M
National Institute of Health R01DK11833NIH HHS R01AI110642
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implication of the heterogeneous spectrum of pro- and anti-inflammatory macrophages (Macs) has been an important area of investigation over the last decade. The polarization of Macs alters their functional phenotype in response to their surrounding microenvironment. Macs are the major immune cells implicated in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis. A hallmark pathology of atherosclerosis is the accumulation of pro-inflammatory M1-like macrophages in coronary arteries induced by pro-atherogenic stimuli; these M1-like pro-inflammatory macrophages are incapable of digesting lipids, thus resulting in foam cell formation in the atherosclerotic plaques. Recent findings suggest that the progression and stability of atherosclerotic plaques are dependent on the quantity of infiltrated Macs, the polarization state of the Macs, and the ratios of different types of Mac populations. The polarization of Macs is defined by signature markers on the cell surface, as well as by factors in intracellular and intranuclear compartments. At the same time, pro- and anti-inflammatory polarized Macs also exhibit different gene expression patterns, with differential cellular characteristics in oxidative phosphorylation and glycolysis. Macs are reflective of different metabolic states and various types of diseases. In this review, we discuss the major differences between M1-like Macs and M2-like Macs, their associated metabolic pathways, and their roles in atherosclerosis.

Indexed as

AtherosclerosisPlaque, AtheroscleroticHumansMacrophage ActivationMacrophagesPhenotypeatherosclerosisimmunometabolisminnate immunitymacrophagepolarization

Identifiers

PMID35627141
PMCPMC9142092
OpenAlexW4226420351

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.