Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627107›Full record

ArticleGenes2022

Utilization Strategies of Two Environment Phenotypes in Genomic Prediction.

Qing Lin, Jinyan Teng, Xiaodian Cai, Jiaqi Li, Zhe Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genes, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Qing LinGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-8416-9748
Jinyan TengGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0002-3046-1452
Xiaodian CaiGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Jiaqi LiGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.
Zhe ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Lab of Agro-Animal Genomics and Molecular Breeding, Lingnan Guangdong Laboratory of Modern Agriculture, National Engineering Research Centre for Breeding Swine Industry, College of Animal Science, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou 510642, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7338-7718

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multiple environment phenotypes may be utilized to implement genomic prediction in plant breeding, while it is unclear about optimal utilization strategies according to its different availability. It is necessary to assess the utilization strategies of genomic prediction models based on different availability of multiple environment phenotypes. Here, we compared the prediction accuracy of three genomic prediction models (genomic prediction model (genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GBLUP), genomic best linear unbiased prediction (GFBLUP), and multi-trait genomic best linear unbiased prediction (mtGBLUP)) which leveraged diverse information from multiple environment phenotypes using a rice dataset containing 19 agronomic traits in two disparate seasons. We found that the prediction accuracy of genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) was better than the classical genomic prediction model (GBLUP model). The deviation of prediction accuracy of between GBLUP and mtGBLUP or GFBLUP was associated with the phenotypic correlation. In summary, the genomic prediction models considering multiple environment phenotypes (GFBLUP and mtGBLUP) demonstrated better prediction accuracy. In addition, we could utilize different genomic prediction strategies according to different availability of multiple environment phenotypes.

Indexed as

Models, GeneticPlant BreedingGenomicsLinear ModelsPhenotypegenome-wide association studygenomic feature best linear unbiased predictiongenomic predictionmultiple environment phenotypesmulti-trait genomic best linear unbiased predictionrice

Identifiers

PMID35627107
PMCPMC9141986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.