Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35627054›Full record

ArticleFoods (Basel, Switzerland)2022

How Different Are Industrial, Artisanal and Homemade Soft Breads?

Bastien Maurice, Anne Saint-Eve, Aurélia Pernin, Pascal Leroy, Isabelle Souchon

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Foods (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Bastien MauriceUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SayFood, F-91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4438-2317
Anne Saint-EveUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SayFood, F-91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2910-4666
Aurélia PerninUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, AgroParisTech, UMR SayFood, F-91120 Palaiseau, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3364-350X
Pascal LeroyUniversité Paris-Saclay, INRAE, UMR PSAE, F-91120 Palaiseau, France.
Isabelle SouchonINRAE, Avignon Université, UMR SQPOV, F-84000 Avignon, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6437-8884

Funding

Carnot Institute Qualiment Agreement #20 CARN 0026 01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Soft bread has a significant relevance in modern diets, and its nutritional impact on human health can be substantial. Within this product category, there is an extensive range of ingredients, formulations, and processing methods, which all contribute to the vast diversity found in the final products. This work compared the impact of three different processing methods (industrial, artisanal, and homemade preparation) on the technological (formulation and processing, as they are interconnected in real-life conditions), nutritional, and physicochemical properties of soft bread. In total, 24 types of soft bread were analyzed: 10 industrial, 6 artisanal, and 8 homemade. Although production diagrams were similar among the three methods, industrial recipes contained on average more ingredients and more additives. Industrial bread was lower in saturated fat compared to the other two groups, but contained more sugar than homemade bread. The physical properties of all loaves were comparable, with the exception of higher crumb elasticity in industrial bread compared to homemade. An analysis of volatile molecules revealed more lipid oxidation markers in industrial bread, more fermentation markers in artisanal bread, and fewer markers of Maillard reactions in homemade bread. Chemical reactions during processing seem to be the principal criterion making possible to discriminate the different processing methods. These results offer a quantitative assessment of the differences within a single product category, reflecting the real-world choices for consumers.

Indexed as

aromafermentationGC-MSmulticriteria mappingoxidationprocessed foodsandwich breadtexturevolatilewhite bread

Identifiers

PMID35627054
PMCPMC9140824

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.