Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626744›Full record

ReviewCells2022

Current Therapeutic Landscape and Safety Roadmap for Targeting the Aryl Hydrocarbon Receptor in Inflammatory Gastrointestinal Indications.

Samantha C Faber, Tejas S Lahoti, Ewan R Taylor, Lauren Lewis, Jessica M Sapiro, Vicencia Toledo Sales, Yvonne P Dragan, Brandon D Jeffy

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cells, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 16% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Regulation ofFrontiers in immunology · 2024
    Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Samantha C FaberDiscovery Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Tejas S LahotiDiscovery Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7834-7715
Ewan R TaylorGastrointestinal Immunology, Gastrointestinal Drug Discovery Unit, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Lauren LewisInvestigative Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Jessica M SapiroRegulatory Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Vicencia Toledo SalesInvestigative Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.
Yvonne P DraganDiscovery Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Brandon D JeffyDiscovery Toxicology, Drug Safety Research & Evaluation, Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., San Diego, CA 92121, USA.
Takeda (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Target modulation of the AhR for inflammatory gastrointestinal (GI) conditions holds great promise but also the potential for safety liabilities both within and beyond the GI tract. The ubiquitous expression of the AhR across mammalian tissues coupled with its role in diverse signaling pathways makes development of a "clean" AhR therapeutically challenging. Ligand promiscuity and diversity in context-specific AhR activation further complicates targeting the AhR for drug development due to limitations surrounding clinical translatability. Despite these concerns, several approaches to target the AhR have been explored such as small molecules, microbials, PROTACs, and oligonucleotide-based approaches. These various chemical modalities are not without safety liabilities and require unique de-risking strategies to parse out toxicities. Collectively, these programs can benefit from in silico and in vitro methodologies that investigate specific AhR pathway activation and have the potential to implement thresholding parameters to categorize AhR ligands as "high" or "low" risk for sustained AhR activation. Exploration into transcriptomic signatures for AhR safety assessment, incorporation of physiologically-relevant in vitro model systems, and investigation into chronic activation of the AhR by structurally diverse ligands will help address gaps in our understanding regarding AhR-dependent toxicities. Here, we review the role of the AhR within the GI tract, novel therapeutic modality approaches to target the AhR, key AhR-dependent safety liabilities, and relevant strategies that can be implemented to address drug safety concerns. Together, this review discusses the emerging therapeutic landscape of modalities targeting the AhR for inflammatory GI indications and offers a safety roadmap for AhR drug development.

Indexed as

Receptors, Aryl HydrocarbonSignal TransductionAnimalsGastrointestinal TractLigandsMammalsLigandsReceptors, Aryl Hydrocarbonaryl hydrocarbon receptorCYP1A1gastrointestinal toxicityinflammationmicrobiomeoligonucleotidesPROTACsafety assessmenttoxicogenomics

Identifiers

PMID35626744
PMCPMC9139855
OpenAlexW4281257096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.