Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626613›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

An Extensive Assessment of Network Embedding in PPI Network Alignment.

Marianna Milano, Chiara Zucco, Marzia Settino, Mario Cannataro

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Marianna MilanoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Data Analytics Research Center, University Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1561-725X
Chiara ZuccoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Data Analytics Research Center, University Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-0048-0457
Marzia SettinoDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Data Analytics Research Center, University Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-5558-9033
Mario CannataroDepartment of Medical and Surgical Sciences, Data Analytics Research Center, University Magna Græcia, 88100 Catanzaro, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-1502-2387

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Network alignment is a fundamental task in network analysis. In the biological field, where the protein-protein interaction (PPI) is represented as a graph, network alignment allowed the discovery of underlying biological knowledge such as conserved evolutionary pathways and functionally conserved proteins throughout different species. A recent trend in network science concerns network embedding, i.e., the modelling of nodes in a network as a low-dimensional feature vector. In this survey, we present an overview of current PPI network embedding alignment methods, a comparison among them, and a comparison to classical PPI network alignment algorithms. The results of this comparison highlight that: (i) only five network embeddings for network alignment algorithms have been applied in the biological context, whereas the literature presents several classical network alignment algorithms; (ii) there is a need for developing an evaluation framework that may enable a unified comparison between different algorithms; (iii) the majority of the proposed algorithms perform network embedding through matrix factorization-based techniques; (iv) three out of five algorithms leverage external biological resources, while the remaining two are designed for domain agnostic network alignment and tested on PPI networks; (v) two algorithms out of three are stated to perform multi-network alignment, while the remaining perform pairwise network alignment.

Indexed as

network alignmentnetwork embeddingPPI

Identifiers

PMID35626613
PMCPMC9141406

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.