Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626488›Full record

ArticleEntropy (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Exploration of Entropy Pair Functional Theory.

Clifton C Sluss, Jace Pittman, Donald M Nicholson, David J Keffer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Entropy (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 65% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Clifton C SlussDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7634-3163
Jace PittmanDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.
Donald M NicholsonDepartment of Physics and Astronomy, University of North Carolina, Asheville, NC 28803, USA.
David J KefferDepartment of Materials Science & Engineering, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN 37996, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6246-0286
University of Tennessee at Knoxville · USUniversity of North Carolina at Asheville · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of the entropy from molecular dynamics (MD) simulation remains an outstanding challenge. The standard approach requires thermodynamic integration across a series of simulations. Recent work Nicholson et al. demonstrated the ability to construct a functional that returns excess entropy, based on the pair correlation function (PCF); it was capable of providing, with acceptable accuracy, the absolute excess entropy of iron simulated with a pair potential in both fluid and crystalline states. In this work, the general applicability of the Entropy Pair Functional Theory (EPFT) approach is explored by applying it to three many-body interaction potentials. These potentials are state of the art for large scale models for the three materials in this study: Fe modelled with a modified embedded atom method (MEAM) potential, Cu modelled with an MEAM and Si modelled with a Tersoff potential. We demonstrate the robust nature of EPFT in determining excess entropy for diverse systems with many-body interactions. These are steps toward a universal Entropy Pair Functional, EPF, that can be applied with confidence to determine the entropy associated with sophisticated optimized potentials and first principles simulations of liquids, crystals, engineered structures, and defects.

Indexed as

copperentropy pair functionalironmodified embedded-atom methodmolecular dynamics simulationsiliconTersoff

Identifiers

PMID35626488
PMCPMC9140801
OpenAlexW4224987962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.