Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626420›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Clinical Validation of a Rapid Variant-Proof RT-RPA Assay for the Detection of SARS-CoV-2.

Dounia Cherkaoui, Judith Heaney, Da Huang, Matthew Byott, Benjamin S Miller, Eleni Nastouli, Rachel A McKendry

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Mobile Efficient Diagnostics of Infectious Diseases via On-Chip RT-qPCR: MEDIC-PCR.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Dounia CherkaouiLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8130-6057
Judith HeaneyAdvanced Pathogen Diagnostics Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Da HuangLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3219-5565
Matthew ByottAdvanced Pathogen Diagnostics Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Benjamin S MillerLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.
Eleni NastouliAdvanced Pathogen Diagnostics Unit, University College London Hospitals (UCLH) NHS Trust, London NW1 2BU, UK.
Rachel A McKendryLondon Centre for Nanotechnology, University College London, London WC1E 6BT, UK.

Funding

Discovery to use grant for Early-stage translation of spin-enhanced FND diagnostics for ultra-sensitive disease detection KEI2021-01-04EPSRC IRC in Agile Early Warning Sensing Systems for Infectious Diseases and Antimicrobial Resistance EP/R00529X/1EPSRC LCN studentship EP/N509577/1NIHR UCLH Biomedical Research Centre Award 545227
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic has unveiled a pressing need to expand the diagnostic landscape to permit high-volume testing in peak demand. Rapid nucleic acid testing based on isothermal amplification is a viable alternative to real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and can help close this gap. With the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern, clinical validation of rapid molecular tests needs to demonstrate their ability to detect known variants, an essential requirement for a robust pan-SARS-CoV-2 assay. To date, there has been no clinical validation of reverse transcription recombinase polymerase amplification (RT-RPA) assays for SARS-CoV-2 variants. We performed a clinical validation of a one-pot multi-gene RT-RPA assay with the E and RdRP genes of SARS-CoV-2 as targets. The assay was validated with 91 nasopharyngeal samples, with a full range of viral loads, collected at University College London Hospitals. Moreover, the assay was tested with previously sequenced clinical samples, including eleven lineages of SARS-CoV-2. The rapid (20 min) RT-RPA assay showed high sensitivity and specificity, equal to 96% and 97%, respectively, compared to gold standard real-time RT-PCR. The assay did not show cross-reactivity with the panel of respiratory pathogens tested. We also report on a semi-quantitative analysis of the RT-RPA results with correlation to viral load equivalents. Furthermore, the assay could detect all eleven SARS-CoV-2 lineages tested, including four variants of concern (Alpha, Beta, Delta, and Omicron). This variant-proof SARS-CoV-2 assay offers a significantly faster and simpler alternative to RT-PCR, delivering sensitive and specific results with clinical samples.

Indexed as

clinical samplesisothermal amplificationrecombinase polymerase amplificationSARS-CoV-2

Identifiers

PMID35626420
PMCPMC9141210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.