Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626413›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

A Comprehensive Performance Analysis of Transfer Learning Optimization in Visual Field Defect Classification.

Masyitah Abu, Nik Adilah Hanin Zahri, Amiza Amir, Muhammad Izham Ismail, Azhany Yaakub, Said Amirul Anwar, Muhammad Imran Ahmad

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Masyitah AbuCenter of Excellence for Advanced Computing, Faculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia.
Nik Adilah Hanin ZahriCenter of Excellence for Advanced Computing, Faculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia.ORCID 0000-0002-1748-8458
Amiza AmirCenter of Excellence for Advanced Computing, Faculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Kangar 01000, Malaysia.
Muhammad Izham IsmailInstitute of Engineering Mathematics, Faculty of Applied and Human Sciences, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Malaysia.
Azhany YaakubDepartment of Ophthalmology & Visual Science, School of Medical Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Kubang Kerian 16150, Malaysia.
Said Amirul AnwarFaculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Malaysia.
Muhammad Imran AhmadFaculty of Electronic Engineering Technology, Universiti Malaysia Perlis, Arau 02600, Malaysia.

Funding

Universiti Malaysia Perlis FRGS900300646
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Numerous research have demonstrated that Convolutional Neural Network (CNN) models are capable of classifying visual field (VF) defects with great accuracy. In this study, we evaluated the performance of different pre-trained models (VGG-Net, MobileNet, ResNet, and DenseNet) in classifying VF defects and produced a comprehensive comparative analysis to compare the performance of different CNN models before and after hyperparameter tuning and fine-tuning. Using 32 batch sizes, 50 epochs, and ADAM as the optimizer to optimize weight, bias, and learning rate, VGG-16 obtained the highest accuracy of 97.63 percent, according to experimental findings. Subsequently, Bayesian optimization was utilized to execute automated hyperparameter tuning and automated fine-tuning layers of the pre-trained models to determine the optimal hyperparameter and fine-tuning layer for classifying many VF defect with the highest accuracy. We found that the combination of different hyperparameters and fine-tuning of the pre-trained models significantly impact the performance of deep learning models for this classification task. In addition, we also discovered that the automated selection of optimal hyperparameters and fine-tuning by Bayesian has significantly enhanced the performance of the pre-trained models. The results observed the best performance for the DenseNet-121 model with a validation accuracy of 98.46% and a test accuracy of 99.57% for the tested datasets.

Indexed as

CNNfine-tuninghyperparameterVF defect

Identifiers

PMID35626413
PMCPMC9140208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.