Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626411›Full record

ReviewDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Diagnostic Accuracy of Point-of-Care HCV Viral Load Assays for HCV Diagnosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Weiming Tang, Yusha Tao, Emmanuel Fajardo, Elena Ivanova Reipold, Roger Chou, Joseph D Tucker, Philippa Easterbrook

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Performance Evaluation of the Xpert® HCV Test on Fingerstick Blood in a Prospective Observational Clinical Study at CLIA-Waived Sites in the United States.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2026
    Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. SASLT guidelines: Update in treatment of hepatitis C virus infection, 2024.Saudi journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association · 2024
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Weiming TangUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou 510095, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9026-707X
Yusha TaoUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Emmanuel FajardoDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-7561-3368
Elena Ivanova ReipoldFIND, The Global Alliance for Diagnostics, 1202 Geneva, Switzerland.
Roger ChouDepartments of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA.
Joseph D TuckerUniversity of North Carolina Project-China, Guangzhou 510095, China.
Philippa EasterbrookDepartment of Global HIV, Hepatitis and STI Programmes, World Health Organization, 1211 Geneva, Switzerland.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USWorld Health Organization · CHFIND · CHOregon Health & Science University · US

Funding

World Health Organization 001
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite the widespread availability of curative treatment with direct-acting antivirals, a significant proportion of people with HCV remain undiagnosed and untreated. New point-of-care (PoC) HCV RNA assays that can be used in clinical settings may help expand access to testing and treatment. This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of PoC HCV viral load assays compared to laboratory-based testing. Methods: We searched three databases for studies published before May 2021 that evaluated PoC HCV RNA assays against a laboratory NAT reference standard (Prospero CRD42021269022). Random effects bivariate models were used to summarize the estimates. Stratified analyses were performed based on geographic region, population (PWID, etc.), and specimen type (serum/plasma or fingerstick; fresh or frozen). We used the GRADE approach to assess the certainty of the evidence. Results: A total of 25 studies were eligible. We evaluated five different commercially available viral load assays. The pooled sensitivity and specificity were 99% (95% CI: 98−99%) and 99% (95% CI: 99−100%), respectively. High sensitivity and specificity were observed across different assays, study settings (including LMICs and HICs), and populations. There was a small but statistically significant reduction in sensitivity for fingersticks compared to serum or plasma samples (98% vs. 100%, p < 0.05), but the specificity was similar between frozen and fresh samples. The evidence was rated as moderate-high certainty. Conclusions: PoC HCV viral load assays demonstrate excellent diagnostic performance in various settings and populations. The WHO now recommends using PoC HCV viral load assays as an additional strategy to promote access to confirmatory viral load testing and treatment.

Indexed as

diagnostic accuracyhepatitis cpoint-of-careviral load testing

Identifiers

PMID35626411
PMCPMC9141110
OpenAlexW4280588683

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.