Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626290›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Bio-Imaging-Based Machine Learning Algorithm for Breast Cancer Detection.

Sadia Safdar, Muhammad Rizwan, Thippa Reddy Gadekallu, Abdul Rehman Javed, Mohammad Khalid Imam Rahmani, Khurram Jawad, Surbhi Bhatia

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Deep Transfer Learning-Based Foot No-Ball Detection in Live Cricket Match.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. CNN Based Multiclass Brain Tumor Detection Using Medical Imaging.Computational intelligence and neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 3 countries.

Sadia SafdarDepartment of Computer Science, Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore 44000, Pakistan.
Muhammad RizwanDepartment of Computer Science, Kinnaird College for Women, Lahore 44000, Pakistan.
Thippa Reddy GadekalluSchool of Information Technology and Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology, Vellore 632014, India.ORCID 0000-0003-0097-801X
Abdul Rehman JavedDepartment of Cyber Security, Air University, Islamabad 44000, Pakistan.ORCID 0000-0002-0570-1813
Mohammad Khalid Imam RahmaniCollege of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0002-1937-7145
Khurram JawadCollege of Computing and Informatics, Saudi Electronic University, Riyadh 11673, Saudi Arabia.
Surbhi BhatiaDepartment of Information Systems, College of Computer Science & Information Technology, King Faisal University, Hofuf 31982, Saudi Arabia.ORCID 0000-0003-3097-6568
Kinnaird College for Women University · PKSaudi Electronic University · SAAir University · PKKing Faisal University · SAVellore Institute of Technology University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is one of the most widespread diseases in women worldwide. It leads to the second-largest mortality rate in women, especially in European countries. It occurs when malignant lumps that are cancerous start to grow in the breast cells. Accurate and early diagnosis can help in increasing survival rates against this disease. A computer-aided detection (CAD) system is necessary for radiologists to differentiate between normal and abnormal cell growth. This research consists of two parts; the first part involves a brief overview of the different image modalities, using a wide range of research databases to source information such as ultrasound, histography, and mammography to access various publications. The second part evaluates different machine learning techniques used to estimate breast cancer recurrence rates. The first step is to perform preprocessing, including eliminating missing values, data noise, and transformation. The dataset is divided as follows: 60% of the dataset is used for training, and the rest, 40%, is used for testing. We focus on minimizing type one false-positive rate (FPR) and type two false-negative rate (FNR) errors to improve accuracy and sensitivity. Our proposed model uses machine learning techniques such as support vector machine (SVM), logistic regression (LR), and K-nearest neighbor (KNN) to achieve better accuracy in breast cancer classification. Furthermore, we attain the highest accuracy of 97.7% with 0.01 FPR, 0.03 FNR, and an area under the ROC curve (AUC) score of 0.99. The results show that our proposed model successfully classifies breast tumors while overcoming previous research limitations. Finally, we summarize the paper with the future trends and challenges of the classification and segmentation in breast cancer detection.

Indexed as

breast cancercomputer-aided detection (CAD)deep learningK-nearest neighbor (KNN)machine learningsupport vector machine (SVM)

Identifiers

PMID35626290
PMCPMC9140096
OpenAlexW4225302882

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.