Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626277›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Generative Adversarial Network (GAN) for Automatic Reconstruction of the 3D Spine Structure by Using Simulated Bi-Planar X-ray Images.

Ching-Juei Yang, Cheng-Li Lin, Chien-Kuo Wang, Jing-Yao Wang, Chih-Chia Chen, Fong-Chin Su, Yin-Ju Lee, Chun-Chung Lui, Lee-Ren Yeh, Yu-Hua Dean Fang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. 3D spine reconstruction from a single radiograph based on GANs.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 3D biplanar reconstruction of lower limbs using nonlinear statistical models.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Ching-Juei YangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-5539-6899
Cheng-Li LinDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 704302, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-7315-7709
Chien-Kuo WangDepartment of Medical Imaging, National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0001-8887-2935
Jing-Yao WangDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.
Chih-Chia ChenDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.
Fong-Chin SuDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, National Cheng Kung University, Tainan 701401, Taiwan.ORCID 0000-0002-3870-4842
Yin-Ju LeeDepartment of Medical Imaging, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.
Chun-Chung LuiDepartment of Medical Imaging, E-Da Cancer Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.
Lee-Ren YehDepartment of Radiology, E-Da Hospital, I-Shou University, Kaohsiung City 82445, Taiwan.
Yu-Hua Dean FangDepartment of Radiology, School of Medicine, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, AL 35294, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1039-7983

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, R.O.C. 107-2221-E-650-001-MY2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we modified the previously proposed X2CT-GAN to build a 2Dto3D-GAN of the spine. This study also incorporated the radiologist's perspective in the adjustment of input signals to prove the feasibility of the automatic production of three-dimensional (3D) structures of the spine from simulated bi-planar two-dimensional (2D) X-ray images. Data from 1012 computed tomography (CT) studies of 984 patients were retrospectively collected. We tested this model under different dataset sizes (333, 666, and 1012) with different bone signal conditions to observe the training performance. A 10-fold cross-validation and five metrics-Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) value, Jaccard similarity coefficient (JSC), overlap volume (OV), and structural similarity index (SSIM)-were applied for model evaluation. The optimal mean values for DSC, JSC, OV, SSIM_anteroposterior (AP), and SSIM_Lateral (Lat) were 0.8192, 0.6984, 0.8624, 0.9261, and 0.9242, respectively. There was a significant improvement in the training performance under empirically enhanced bone signal conditions and with increasing training dataset sizes. These results demonstrate the potential of the clinical implantation of GAN for automatic production of 3D spine images from 2D images. This prototype model can serve as a foundation in future studies applying transfer learning for the development of advanced medical diagnostic techniques.

Indexed as

3-dimensional (3D) spinegenerative adversarial network (GAN)simulated biplanar X-ray

Identifiers

PMID35626277
PMCPMC9139385

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.