ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022
Comparison of Nonclassic and Classic Phenotype of Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Focused on Prognostic Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Parameters: A Single-Center Observational Study.
Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with nonclassic phenotypes (NCP)—more advanced stages of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM)—constitute an intriguing and heterogeneous group that is difficult to diagnose, risk-stratify, and treat, and often neglected in research projects. We aimed to compare cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) parameters in NCP versus classic phenotypes (CP) of HCM with special emphasis given to the parameters of established and potential prognostic importance, including numerous variables not used in everyday clinical practice. The CMR studies of 88 patients performed from 2011 to 2019 were postprocessed according to the study protocol to obtain standard and non-standard parameters. In NCP, the late gadolinium enhancement extent expressed as percent of left ventricular mass (%LGE) and left ventricular mass index (LVMI) were higher, left atrium emptying fraction (LAEF) was lower, minimal left atrial volume (LAV min) was greater, and myocardial contraction fraction (MCF) and left ventricular global function index (LVGFI) were lower than in CP (p < 0.001 for all). In contrast, HCM risk score and left ventricular maximal thickness (LVMT) were similar in NCP and CP patients. No left ventricular outflow tract obstruction (LVOTO) was observed in the NCP group. Left ventricular outflow tract diameter (LVOT), aortic valve diameter (Ao), and LVOT/Ao ratio were significantly higher and anterior mitral leaflet (AML)/LVOT ratio was lower in the NCP compared to the CP group. In conclusion, significant differences in nonstandard CMR parameters were noted between the nonclassic and classic HCM phenotypes that may contribute to future studies on disease stages and risk stratification in HCM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.