Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626201›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Automated Detection, Segmentation, and Classification of Pericardial Effusions on Chest CT Using a Deep Convolutional Neural Network.

Adrian Jonathan Wilder-Smith, Shan Yang, Thomas Weikert, Jens Bremerich, Philip Haaf, Martin Segeroth, Lars C Ebert, Alexander Sauter, Raphael Sexauer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Adrian Jonathan Wilder-SmithDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7662-4248
Shan YangDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Thomas WeikertDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-9274-053X
Jens BremerichDepartment of Radiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.
Philip HaafDepartment of Cardiology, University Hospital Basel, University of Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-5657-6637
Martin SegerothDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0001-7820-2778
Lars C Ebert3D Center Zurich, Institute of Forensic Medicine, University of Zürich, 8057 Zürich, Switzerland.
Alexander SauterDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6707-2258
Raphael SexauerDivision of Research and Analytical Services, University Hospital Basel, 4031 Basel, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9949-7912
University of Basel · CHUniversity Hospital of Basel · CHUniversity of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Pericardial effusions (PEFs) are often missed on Computed Tomography (CT), which particularly affects the outcome of patients presenting with hemodynamic compromise. An automatic PEF detection, segmentation, and classification tool would expedite and improve CT based PEF diagnosis; 258 CTs with (206 with simple PEF, 52 with hemopericardium) and without PEF (each 134 with contrast, 124 non-enhanced) were identified using the radiology report (01/2016−01/2021). PEF were manually 3D-segmented. A deep convolutional neural network (nnU-Net) was trained on 316 cases and separately tested on the remaining 200 and 22 external post-mortem CTs. Inter-reader variability was tested on 40 CTs. PEF classification utilized the median Hounsfield unit from each prediction. The sensitivity and specificity for PEF detection was 97% (95% CI 91.48−99.38%) and 100.00% (95% CI 96.38−100.00%) and 89.74% and 83.61% for diagnosing hemopericardium (AUC 0.944, 95% CI 0.904−0.984). Model performance (Dice coefficient: 0.75 ± 0.01) was non-inferior to inter-reader (0.69 ± 0.02) and was unaffected by contrast administration nor alternative chest pathology (p > 0.05). External dataset testing yielded similar results. Our model reliably detects, segments, and classifies PEF on CT in a complex dataset, potentially serving as an alert tool whilst enhancing report quality. The model and corresponding datasets are publicly available.

Indexed as

AI (Artificial Intelligence)computed tomographyDCNN (deep convolutional neural network)hemopericardiumpericardial effusionX-ray

Identifiers

PMID35626201
PMCPMC9139725
OpenAlexW4224294017

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.