Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626187›Full record

ArticleDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

AI Model for Prostate Biopsies Predicts Cancer Survival.

Kevin Sandeman, Sami Blom, Ville Koponen, Anniina Manninen, Juuso Juhila, Antti Rannikko, Tuomas Ropponen, Tuomas Mirtti

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Applications of artificial intelligence in urologic oncology.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kevin SandemanMedicum and Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Sami BlomAiforia Technologies Plc., Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Ville KoponenAiforia Technologies Plc., Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Anniina ManninenAiforia Technologies Plc., Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Juuso JuhilaAiforia Technologies Plc., Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Antti RannikkoMedicum and Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomas RopponenAiforia Technologies Plc., Tukholmankatu 8, 00290 Helsinki, Finland.
Tuomas MirttiMedicum and Research Program in Systems Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Helsinki, P.O. Box 63, 00014 Helsinki, Finland.ORCID 0000-0003-0455-9891

Funding

Academy of Finland 304667Cancer Foundation Finland 191118; 180132Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa TYH2018214; TYH2019235Jane and Aatos Erkko Foundation 290520
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm for prostate cancer detection and grading was developed for clinical diagnostics on biopsies. The study cohort included 4221 scanned slides from 872 biopsy sessions at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital during 2016-2017 and a subcohort of 126 patients treated by robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RALP) during 2016-2019. In the validation cohort (n = 391), the model detected cancer with a sensitivity of 98% and specificity of 98% (weighted kappa 0.96 compared with the pathologist's diagnosis). Algorithm-based detection of the grade area recapitulated the pathologist's grade group. The area of AI-detected cancer was associated with extra-prostatic extension (G5 OR: 48.52; 95% CI 1.11-8.33), seminal vesicle invasion (cribriform G4 OR: 2.46; 95% CI 0.15-1.7; G5 OR: 5.58; 95% CI 0.45-3.42), and lymph node involvement (cribriform G4 OR: 2.66; 95% CI 0.2-1.8; G5 OR: 4.09; 95% CI 0.22-3). Algorithm-detected grade group 3-5 prostate cancer depicted increased risk for biochemical recurrence compared with grade groups 1-2 (HR: 5.91; 95% CI 1.96-17.83). This study showed that a deep learning model not only can find and grade prostate cancer on biopsies comparably with pathologists but also can predict adverse staging and probability for recurrence after surgical treatment.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebiopsydeep learninggrade groupprostate cancerradical prostatectomy

Identifiers

PMID35626187
PMCPMC9139241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.