Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626174›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Enucleation Is a Feasible Procedure for Well-Differentiated pNEN-A Matched Pair Analysis.

Anna Nießen, Fabiola A Bechtiger, Ulf Hinz, Magdalena Lewosinska, Franck Billmann, Thilo Hackert, Markus W Büchler, Simon Schimmack

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Anna NießenDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1255-6095
Fabiola A BechtigerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ulf HinzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-8227-968X
Magdalena LewosinskaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Franck BillmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-5076-2332
Thilo HackertDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Markus W BüchlerDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Simon SchimmackDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, Im Neuenheimer Feld 420, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The extent of surgical resection in the treatment of pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasms (pNEN) is still controversial. This study aimed to evaluate the outcomes of enucleation for well-differentiated non-functional (nf) pNEN. Patients undergoing enucleation (2001−2020) were analyzed. Clinicopathological parameters, perioperative outcomes and survival were assessed. The analysis was performed as a nested case-control study and matched-pair analysis with formal resection. Sixty-one patients undergoing enucleation were identified. Compared to patients undergoing formal resection, enucleation was associated with a significantly shorter median length of operative time (128 (IQR 95−170) versus 263 (172−337) minutes, p < 0.0001) and a significantly lower rate of postoperative diabetes (2% versus 21%, p = 0.0020). There was no significant difference in postoperative pancreatic fistula rate (18% versus 16% type B/C, p = 1.0), Clavien−Dindo ≥ III complications (20% versus 26%, p = 0.5189), readmission rate (12% versus 15%, p = 0.6022) or length of hospital stay (8 (7−11) versus 10 (8−17) days, p = 0.0652). There was no 30-day mortality after enucleation compared to 1.6% (n = 1) after formal resection. 10-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was similar between the two groups (OS: 89% versus 77%, p = 0.2756; DFS: 98% versus 91%, p = 0.0873). Enucleation presents a safe surgical approach for well-differentiated nf-pNEN with good long-term outcomes for selected patients.

Indexed as

enucleationformal resectionneuroendocrine tumorspNENsurgery

Identifiers

PMID35626174
PMCPMC9139922
OpenAlexW4281388361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.