Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626160›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Selection Criteria for Pressurized Intraperitoneal Aerosol Chemotherapy (PIPAC) Treatment in Patients with Peritoneal Metastases.

Aurélie Balmer, Daniel Clerc, Laura Toussaint, Olivia Sgarbura, Abdelkader Taïbi, Martin Hübner, Hugo Teixeira Farinha

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Aurélie BalmerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Daniel ClercDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9285-3312
Laura ToussaintDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Olivia SgarburaSurgical Oncology Department, Montpellier Cancer Institute (ICM), University of Montpellier, F-34298 Montpellier, France.
Abdelkader TaïbiDigestive Surgery Department, Dupuytren Limoges University Hospital, CNRS, XLIM, UMR 7252, F-87000 Limoges, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1036-6474
Martin HübnerDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-4521-8279
Hugo Teixeira FarinhaDepartment of Visceral Surgery, Faculty of Biology and Medicine UNIL, Lausanne University Hospital (CHUV), Rue du Bugnon 46, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-9786-5208
University of Lausanne · CHCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRInserm · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The standard treatment protocol for PIPAC consists of three procedures. Completion of treatment has been shown to be prognostic of improved survival. The aim of this study was to identify predictors for completion of treatment. Methods: Retrospective multicentric cohort study of patients with peritoneal metastases undergoing PIPAC in three PIPAC expert centers. Per protocol (PP) treatment was defined as patients receiving ≥3 PIPACs and was compared to patients receiving <3. Results: Overall, 183 patients had 517 PIPACs. The main reasons for stopping PIPAC were disease progression in 50% patients, bowel obstruction in 15%, patient’s refusal to pursue in 10%, conversion to cytoreductive surgery in 7%, and medical reasons in 8%. Overall, 95 patients (52%) had PP treatment. The PP median OS was 17 vs. 7 months, p = 0.001. PP patients had r ascites (410 ± 100 mL vs. 960 ± 188 mL, p = 0.001), no prior history of bowel obstruction (12% vs. 24%, p = 0.028), and more bimodal treatment (39% vs. 13%, p < 0.001). After multiple regression, bimodal treatment was found as an independent predictive factor for completing PP (OR = 4.202, 95%CI [1.813, 10.630], p < 0.001), along with prior bowel obstruction (OR = 0.389, 95%CI [0.153, 0.920], p = 0.037). Conclusion: The absence of ascites and prior bowel obstruction can help to select patients suitable for PIPAC. Best results seem to be achieved when PIPAC is combined with systemic chemotherapy.

Indexed as

carcinomatosisperitoneal cancerperitoneal metastasesperitoneal surface malignanciesPIPAC

Identifiers

PMID35626160
PMCPMC9139612
OpenAlexW4281397128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.