ArticleCancers2022
Characterization of Poorly Cohesive and Signet Ring Cell Carcinomas and Identification of PTPRM as a Diagnostic Marker.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sparse spectral graph analysis and its application to gastric cancer drug resistance-specific molecular interplays identification.PloS one · 2024Article
- Role of protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type M in epithelial ovarian cancer progression.Journal of ovarian research · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Background and aims. Signet ring cell (SRC) and poorly cohesive (PC) gastric carcinomas are morphologically similar but exhibit different biological behavior. We compared the clinical and molecular characteristics of SRC and PC carcinomas. Methods. Diffuse-type gastric cancer (GC) cases were classified into SRC carcinomas (>90% of SRCs), PC carcinomas (<10% of SRCs), and combined PC/SRC carcinomas (≤90% but ≥10% of SRCs). The gene expression patterns in SRC and PC carcinomas were examined by transcriptome and protein immunohistochemistry analyses, and diagnostic and prognostic biomarkers were identified. Results. SRC and PC carcinomas showed significantly different clinical behaviors but shared common RNA expression patterns. PC carcinomas showed an increased expression of genes related to cancer progression. Among genes differentially expressed between PC and SRC carcinomas, protein tyrosine phosphatase receptor type M (PTPRM) was overexpressed in PC and related to unfavorable clinical factors. Conclusion. We found that PC and SRC carcinomas had distinct clinical characteristics and should be classified as different carcinoma types. PTPRM was identified as a potential diagnostic and prognostic biomarker for PC carcinomas and could represent a potential therapeutic target.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.