Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35626009›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Computational Screening of Anti-Cancer Drugs Identifies a New BRCA Independent Gene Expression Signature to Predict Breast Cancer Sensitivity to Cisplatin.

Jean Berthelet, Momeneh Foroutan, Dharmesh D Bhuva, Holly J Whitfield, Farrah El-Saafin, Joseph Cursons, Antonin Serrano, Michal Merdas, Elgene Lim, Emmanuelle Charafe-Jauffret and 8 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 53% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jean BertheletOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Momeneh ForoutanBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Dharmesh D BhuvaBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Holly J WhitfieldBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7282-387X
Farrah El-SaafinOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Joseph CursonsBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Antonin SerranoOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Michal MerdasOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Elgene LimGarvan Institute of Medical Research, Darlinghurst, NSW 2010, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8065-8838
Emmanuelle Charafe-JauffretCRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille, Epithelial Stem Laboratory, Equipe Labellisée LIGUE Contre le Cancer, 13009 Marseille, France.
Christophe GinestierCRCM, Inserm, CNRS, Institut Paoli-Calmettes, Aix-Marseille, Epithelial Stem Laboratory, Equipe Labellisée LIGUE Contre le Cancer, 13009 Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7477-3837
Matthias ErnstOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Frédéric HollandeVictorian Comprehensive Cancer Centre, The University of Melbourne Centre for Cancer Research, Melbourne, VIC 3000, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7046-8392
Robin L AndersonOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6841-7422
Bhupinder PalOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Belinda YeoOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.
Melissa J DavisBioinformatics Division, The Walter and Eliza Hall Institute of Medical Research, Parkville, VIC 3052, Australia.
Delphine MerinoOlivia Newton-John Cancer Research Institute, Melbourne, VIC 3084, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8075-6275
The University of Melbourne · AULa Trobe University · AUCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FRGarvan Institute of Medical Research · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The development of therapies that target specific disease subtypes has dramatically improved outcomes for patients with breast cancer. However, survival gains have not been uniform across patients, even within a given molecular subtype. Large collections of publicly available drug screening data matched with transcriptomic measurements have facilitated the development of computational models that predict response to therapy. Here, we generated a series of predictive gene signatures to estimate the sensitivity of breast cancer samples to 90 drugs, comprising FDA-approved drugs or compounds in early development. To achieve this, we used a cell line-based drug screen with matched transcriptomic data to derive in silico models that we validated in large independent datasets obtained from cell lines and patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models. Robust computational signatures were obtained for 28 drugs and used to predict drug efficacy in a set of PDX models. We found that our signature for cisplatin can be used to identify tumors that are likely to respond to this drug, even in absence of the BRCA-1 mutation routinely used to select patients for platinum-based therapies. This clinically relevant observation was confirmed in multiple PDXs. Our study foreshadows an effective delivery approach for precision medicine.

Indexed as

breast cancercisplatindrug sensitivitypharmacogenomicsprecision medicinepredictive modeling

Identifiers

PMID35626009
PMCPMC9139442
OpenAlexW4280566593

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.