Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625993›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Impact of Positive Lymph Nodes and Resection Margin Status on the Overall Survival of Patients with Resected Perihilar Cholangiocarcinoma: The ENSCCA Registry.

Lynn E Nooijen, Jesus M Banales, Marieke T de Boer, Chiara Braconi, Trine Folseraas, Alejandro Forner, Waclaw Holowko, Frederik J H Hoogwater, Heinz-Josef Klümpen, Bas Groot Koerkamp and 10 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
5.9field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Adjuvant therapy of biliary tract cancers.Therapeutic advances in medical oncology · 2023
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Perihilar-cholangiocarcinoma: what really matters?Hepatobiliary surgery and nutrition · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 12 institutions in 6 countries.

Lynn E NooijenDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-5404-4637
Jesus M BanalesDepartment of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain.
Marieke T de BoerSection of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Chiara BraconiThe Royal Marsden NHS Trust, London SW3 6JJ, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4835-1259
Trine FolseraasNorwegian PSC Research Center and Section of Gastroenterology, Department of Transplantation Medicine, Division of Surgery, Inflammatory Medicine and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital Rikshospitalet, 0372 Oslo, Norway.
Alejandro FornerBCLC Group, Liver Unit, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, IDIBAPS, CIBEREHD, University Barcelona, 08036 Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-9014-4950
Waclaw HolowkoDepartment of General, Transplant and Liver Surgery, Medical University of Warsaw, 02-091 Warsaw, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-1419-2704
Frederik J H HoogwaterSection of HPB Surgery & Liver Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, 9713 GZ Groningen, The Netherlands.
Heinz-Josef KlümpenCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7290-1823
Bas Groot KoerkampDepartment of Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Angela LamarcaDepartment of Medical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Wilmslow Road, Manchester M20 4BX, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9696-6122
Adelaida La CastaDepartment of Medical Oncology, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain.
Flora López-LópezDepartment of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, 28041 Madrid, Spain.
Laura Izquierdo-SánchezDepartment of Liver and Gastrointestinal Diseases, Biodonostia Health Research Institute, Donostia University Hospital, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), 20014 San Sebastián, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-7016-8314
Alexander ScheiterInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0001-6734-261X
Kirsten UtpatelInstitute of Pathology, University of Regensburg, 93053 Regensburg, Germany.
Rutger-Jan SwijnenburgCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Geert KazemierDepartment of Surgery, Amsterdam UMC-Location Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Joris I ErdmannCancer Center Amsterdam, Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, 1081 HV Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
ENSCCA Group
Amsterdam University Medical Centers · NLUniversity Medical Center Groningen · NLUniversity of Regensburg · DEUniversity of the Basque Country · ESErasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLHospital Clínic de Barcelona · ESHospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESIkerbasque · ESMedical University of Warsaw · PLOslo University Hospital · NORoyal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust · GBThe Christie NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

European Union's Horizon 2020 Research and Innovation Program 825510Incyte Bioscience International Sàrl grant award 2020the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL; Registry grant awards 2016 and 2019 to JMB) grant awards 2016 and 2019
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Lymph node metastasis and positive resection margins have been reported to be major determinants of overall survival (OS) and poor recurrence-free survival (RFS) for patients who underwent resection for perihilar cholangiocarcinoma (pCCA). However, the prognostic value of positive lymph nodes independently from resection margin status on OS has not been evaluated. Methods: From the European Cholangiocarcinoma (ENSCCA) registry, patients who underwent resection for pCCA between 1994 and 2021 were included in this retrospective cohort study. The primary outcome was OS stratified for resection margin and lymph node status. The secondary outcome was recurrence-free survival. Results: A total of 325 patients from 11 different centers and six European countries were included. Of these, 194 (59.7%) patients had negative resection margins. In 113 (34.8%) patients, positive lymph nodes were found. Lymph node status, histological grade, and ECOG performance status were independent prognostic factors for survival. The median OS for N0R0, N0R1, N+R0, and N+R1 was 38, 30, 18, and 12 months, respectively (p < 0.001). Conclusion: These data indicate that in the presence of positive regional lymph nodes, resection margin status does not determine OS or RFS in patients with pCCA. Achieving negative margins in patients with positive nodes should not come at the expense of more extensive surgery and associated higher mortality.

Indexed as

lymph nodesoverall survivalperihilar cholangiocarcinomarecurrence-free survivalresection margin

Identifiers

PMID35625993
PMCPMC9140174
OpenAlexW4280617928

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.