Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625977›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Fully Automatic Whole-Volume Tumor Segmentation in Cervical Cancer.

Erlend Hodneland, Satheshkumar Kaliyugarasan, Kari Strøno Wagner-Larsen, Njål Lura, Erling Andersen, Hauke Bartsch, Noeska Smit, Mari Kyllesø Halle, Camilla Krakstad, Alexander Selvikvåg Lundervold and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Artificial intelligence in the diagnosis and management of gynecologic cancer.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Erlend HodnelandMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0003-2828-1521
Satheshkumar KaliyugarasanMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Kari Strøno Wagner-LarsenMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Njål LuraMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Erling AndersenMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8268-1206
Hauke BartschMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Noeska SmitMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Mari Kyllesø HalleDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5053 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-2660-8271
Camilla KrakstadDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5053 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-0174-8139
Alexander Selvikvåg LundervoldMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8663-4247
Ingfrid Salvesen HaldorsenMohn Medical Imaging and Visualization Centre, Department of Radiology, Haukeland University Hospital, 5009 Bergen, Norway.
Haukeland University Hospital · NOWestern Norway University of Applied Sciences · NO

Funding

Norwegian Research Council 461136The Western Norway Regional Health Authority 461120Trond Mohn Foundation BFS2016TMT01Trond Mohn Foundation BFS2018TMT06
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Uterine cervical cancer (CC) is the most common gynecologic malignancy worldwide. Whole-volume radiomic profiling from pelvic MRI may yield prognostic markers for tailoring treatment in CC. However, radiomic profiling relies on manual tumor segmentation which is unfeasible in the clinic. We present a fully automatic method for the 3D segmentation of primary CC lesions using state-of-the-art deep learning (DL) techniques. In 131 CC patients, the primary tumor was manually segmented on T2-weighted MRI by two radiologists (R1, R2). Patients were separated into a train/validation (

Indexed as

cervical cancerdeep learningtumor segmentation

Identifiers

PMID35625977
PMCPMC9139985
OpenAlexW4280508431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.