ArticleCancers2022
Radiophysiomics: Brain Tumors Classification by Machine Learning and Physiological MRI Data.
Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.
- Machine-Learning-Based Survival Prediction in Glioblastoma Using Graph-Theoretical Analysis of Structural Network Alterations.Cancers · 2026Article
- AI-Driven Innovations in Neuroradiology and Neurosurgery: Scoping Review of Current Evidence and Future Directions.Cancers · 2025Review
- Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025Review
- Advanced Deep Learning and Machine Learning Techniques for MRI Brain Tumor Analysis: A Review.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Externally validated and clinically useful machine learning algorithms to support patient-related decision-making in oncology: a scoping review.BMC medical research methodology · 2025Article
- Improving healthcare sustainability using advanced brain simulations using a multi-modal deep learning strategy with VGG19 and bidirectional LSTM.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Application of machine learning in the preoperative radiomic diagnosis of ameloblastoma and odontogenic keratocyst based on cone-beam CT.Dento maxillo facial radiology · 2024Article
- Exploring subtypes of multiple sclerosis through unsupervised machine learning of automated fiber quantification.Japanese journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Review
- Machine Learning-Based Prediction of GliomaCancers · 2024Article
- Brain Tumor Detection and Categorization with Segmentation of Improved Unsupervised Clustering Approach and Machine Learning Classifier.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- CVG-Net: novel transfer learning based deep features for diagnosis of brain tumors using MRI scans.PeerJ. Computer science · 2024Article
- A fine-tuned vision transformer based enhanced multi-class brain tumor classification using MRI scan imagery.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- A novel Gateaux derivatives with efficient DCNN-Resunet method for segmenting multi-class brain tumor.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2023Article
- Article
- Smart brain tumor diagnosis system utilizing deep convolutional neural networks.Multimedia tools and applications · 2023Article
- Artificial Intelligence in Brain Tumor Imaging: A Step toward Personalized Medicine.Current oncology (Toronto, Ont.) · 2023Review
- Article
- Assessing Metabolic Markers in Glioblastoma Using Machine Learning: A Systematic Review.Metabolites · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The precise initial characterization of contrast-enhancing brain tumors has significant consequences for clinical outcomes. Various novel neuroimaging methods have been developed to increase the specificity of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) but also the increased complexity of data analysis. Artificial intelligence offers new options to manage this challenge in clinical settings. Here, we investigated whether multiclass machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to a high-dimensional panel of radiomic features from advanced MRI (advMRI) and physiological MRI (phyMRI; thus, radiophysiomics) could reliably classify contrast-enhancing brain tumors. The recently developed phyMRI technique enables the quantitative assessment of microvascular architecture, neovascularization, oxygen metabolism, and tissue hypoxia. A training cohort of 167 patients suffering from one of the five most common brain tumor entities (glioblastoma, anaplastic glioma, meningioma, primary CNS lymphoma, or brain metastasis), combined with nine common ML algorithms, was used to develop overall 135 classifiers. Multiclass classification performance was investigated using tenfold cross-validation and an independent test cohort. Adaptive boosting and random forest in combination with advMRI and phyMRI data were superior to human reading in accuracy (0.875 vs. 0.850), precision (0.862 vs. 0.798), F-score (0.774 vs. 0.740), AUROC (0.886 vs. 0.813), and classification error (5 vs. 6). The radiologists, however, showed a higher sensitivity (0.767 vs. 0.750) and specificity (0.925 vs. 0.902). We demonstrated that ML-based radiophysiomics could be helpful in the clinical routine diagnosis of contrast-enhancing brain tumors; however, a high expenditure of time and work for data preprocessing requires the inclusion of deep neural networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.