Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625967›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Radiophysiomics: Brain Tumors Classification by Machine Learning and Physiological MRI Data.

Andreas Stadlbauer, Franz Marhold, Stefan Oberndorfer, Gertraud Heinz, Michael Buchfelder, Thomas M Kinfe, Anke Meyer-Bäse

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 49 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Advancements in the application of MRI radiomics in meningioma.Radiation oncology (London, England) · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andreas StadlbauerInstitute of Medical Radiology, University Clinic St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3100 St. Pölten, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8348-2620
Franz MarholdDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Clinic of St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3100 St. Pölten, Austria.ORCID 0000-0001-8338-8060
Stefan OberndorferDepartment of Neurology, University Clinic of St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3100 St. Pölten, Austria.
Gertraud HeinzInstitute of Medical Radiology, University Clinic St. Pölten, Karl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences, A-3100 St. Pölten, Austria.
Michael BuchfelderDepartment of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.
Thomas M KinfeDepartment of Neurosurgery, Friedrich-Alexander University (FAU) Erlangen-Nürnberg, D-91054 Erlangen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4888-543X
Anke Meyer-BäseDepartment of Scientific Computing, Florida State University, 400 Dirac Science Library, Tallahassee, FL 32306-4120, USA.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEKarl Landsteiner University of Health Sciences · ATFlorida State University · USUniversitätsklinikum St. Pölten · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The precise initial characterization of contrast-enhancing brain tumors has significant consequences for clinical outcomes. Various novel neuroimaging methods have been developed to increase the specificity of conventional magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) but also the increased complexity of data analysis. Artificial intelligence offers new options to manage this challenge in clinical settings. Here, we investigated whether multiclass machine learning (ML) algorithms applied to a high-dimensional panel of radiomic features from advanced MRI (advMRI) and physiological MRI (phyMRI; thus, radiophysiomics) could reliably classify contrast-enhancing brain tumors. The recently developed phyMRI technique enables the quantitative assessment of microvascular architecture, neovascularization, oxygen metabolism, and tissue hypoxia. A training cohort of 167 patients suffering from one of the five most common brain tumor entities (glioblastoma, anaplastic glioma, meningioma, primary CNS lymphoma, or brain metastasis), combined with nine common ML algorithms, was used to develop overall 135 classifiers. Multiclass classification performance was investigated using tenfold cross-validation and an independent test cohort. Adaptive boosting and random forest in combination with advMRI and phyMRI data were superior to human reading in accuracy (0.875 vs. 0.850), precision (0.862 vs. 0.798), F-score (0.774 vs. 0.740), AUROC (0.886 vs. 0.813), and classification error (5 vs. 6). The radiologists, however, showed a higher sensitivity (0.767 vs. 0.750) and specificity (0.925 vs. 0.902). We demonstrated that ML-based radiophysiomics could be helpful in the clinical routine diagnosis of contrast-enhancing brain tumors; however, a high expenditure of time and work for data preprocessing requires the inclusion of deep neural networks.

Indexed as

artificial intelligencebrain tumorsmachine learningmulticlass classificationneuro-oncologyphysiological MRIpretreatment classification

Identifiers

PMID35625967
PMCPMC9139355
OpenAlexW4280625250

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.