Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625958›Full record

ArticleCancers2022

Wide Next-Generation Sequencing Characterization of Young Adults Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.

Paola Ulivi, Milena Urbini, Elisabetta Petracci, Matteo Canale, Alessandra Dubini, Daniela Bartolini, Daniele Calistri, Paola Cravero, Eugenio Fonzi, Giovanni Martinelli and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancers, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Paola UliviBiosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Milena UrbiniBiosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-3364-9098
Elisabetta PetracciUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Matteo CanaleBiosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-9768-7149
Alessandra DubiniPathology Unit, "Morgagni-Pierantoni" Hospital, 47121 Forli, Italy.
Daniela BartoliniPathology Unit, "Maurizio Bufalini" Hospital, 47521 Cesena, Italy.
Daniele CalistriBiosciences Laboratory, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5064-2023
Paola CraveroDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Eugenio FonziUnit of Biostatistics and Clinical Trials, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-8389-8220
Giovanni MartinelliDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1025-4210
Ilaria PrianoDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Kalliopi AndrikouDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Giuseppe BronteDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2306-2445
Lucio CrinòDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.
Angelo DelmonteDepartment of Medical Oncology, IRCCS Istituto Romagnolo per lo Studio dei Tumori (IRST) "Dino Amadori", 47014 Meldola, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Molecular characterization of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is mandatory before any treatment decision making. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) approaches represent the best strategy in this context. The turnaround time for NGS methodologies and the related costs are becoming more and more adaptable for their use in clinical practice. In our study, we analyzed a case series of young (under 65 years old) NSCLC patients with a wide NGS gene panel assay. The most frequent altered genes were TP53 (64.55%), followed by KRAS (44.1%), STK11 (26.9%), CDKN2A (21.5%), CDKN2B (14.0%), EGFR (16.1%), and RB1 (10.8%). Tumor mutational burden (TMB) was also evaluated. Considering the cut-off of 10 mut/Mb, 62 (68.9%) patients showed a TMB < 10 mut/Mb, whereas 28 (31.1%) showed a TMB ≥ 10 mut/Mb. STK11 and KRAS mutations were significantly associated with a higher TMB (p = 0.019 and p = 0.004, respectively). Conversely, EGFR and EML4-ALK alterations were more frequently found in tumors with low TMB (p = 0.019 and p < 0.001, respectively). We compared results obtained from this approach with those obtained from a single or few genes approach, observing perfect concordance of the results.

Indexed as

multitargetNGSNSCLCtargeted alterations

Identifiers

PMID35625958
PMCPMC9139648

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.