Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625879›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

The STING Ligand and Delivery System Synergistically Enhance the Immunogenicity of an Intranasal Spike SARS-CoV-2 Vaccine Candidate.

Tuksin Jearanaiwitayakul, Jitra Limthongkul, Chernkhwan Kaofai, Suttikarn Apichirapokey, Runglawan Chawengkirttikul, Sompong Sapsutthipas, Panya Sunintaboon, Sukathida Ubol

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Mucosal immunity and vaccine development.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Harnessing Nanocarriers to Advance Vaccine Development.BioDrugs : clinical immunotherapeutics, biopharmaceuticals and gene therapy · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Recent advances in respiratory immunization: A focus on COVID-19 vaccines.Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society · 2023
    Review
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Tuksin JearanaiwitayakulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2555-8516
Jitra LimthongkulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Chernkhwan KaofaiDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Suttikarn ApichirapokeyDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Runglawan ChawengkirttikulDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Sompong SapsutthipasInstitute of Biological Products, Department of Medical Sciences, Ministry of Public Health, Nonthaburi 11000, Thailand.
Panya SunintaboonDepartment of Chemistry, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Salaya 73170, Thailand.
Sukathida UbolDepartment of Microbiology, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University, Bangkok 10400, Thailand.
Mahidol University · THMinistry of Public Health · TH

Funding

National Vaccine Institute, Thailand 2563.1/9
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The respiratory organ serves as a primary target site for SARS-CoV-2. Thus, the vaccine-stimulating immune response of the respiratory tract is significant in controlling SARS-CoV-2 transmission and disease development. In this study, mucoadhesive nanoparticles were used to deliver SARS-CoV-2 spike proteins (S-NPs) into the nasal tracts of mice. The responses in the respiratory organ and the systemic responses were monitored. The administration of S-NPs along with cGAMP conferred a robust stimulation of antibody responses in the respiratory tract, as demonstrated by an increase of IgA and IgG antibodies toward the spike proteins in bronchoalveolar lavages (BALs) and the lungs. Interestingly, the elicited antibodies were able to neutralize both the wild-type and Delta variant strains of SARS-CoV-2. Significantly, the intranasal immunization also stimulated systemic responses. This is evidenced by the increased production of circulating IgG and IgA, which were able to neutralize and bind specifically to the SARS-CoV-2 virion and spike protein. Additionally, this intranasal administration potently activated a splenic T cell response and the production of Th-1 cytokines, suggesting that this vaccine may well activate a cellular response in the respiratory tract. The results demonstrate that STING agonist strongly acts as an adjuvant to the immunogenicity of S-NPs. This platform may be an ideal vaccine against SARS-CoV-2.

Indexed as

adjuvant nanodeliveryimmunogenicityintranasal COVID-19 vaccineSARS-CoV-2 spike glycoproteinSTING agonist

Identifiers

PMID35625879
PMCPMC9138454
OpenAlexW4280601799

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.