Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625708›Full record

ArticleBiomedicines2022

Predictive Response to Immunotherapy Score: A Useful Tool for Identifying Eligible Patients for Allergen Immunotherapy.

Ilaria Mormile, Francescopaolo Granata, Aikaterini Detoraki, Daniela Pacella, Francesca Della Casa, Felicia De Rosa, Antonio Romano, Amato de Paulis, Francesca Wanda Rossi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomedicines, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Allergy to Cats: Current Perspectives and Therapeutic Options.Clinical and translational allergy · 2026
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ilaria MormileDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-7599-5426
Francescopaolo GranataDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology, Clinical Pathology, and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2793-8889
Aikaterini DetorakiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Clinical Immunology, Clinical Pathology, and Infectious Diseases, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Daniela PacellaDepartment of Public Health, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2343-5069
Francesca Della CasaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0115-1420
Felicia De RosaDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Antonio RomanoDepartment of Neurosciences, Reproductive and Odontostomatological Sciences, Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Amato de PaulisDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
Francesca Wanda RossiDepartment of Translational Medical Sciences, University of Naples Federico II, 80131 Naples, Italy.
University of Naples Federico II · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A specific predictive tool of allergen immunotherapy (AIT) outcome has not been identified yet. This study aims to evaluate the efficacy of a disease score referred to as Predictive Response to Immunotherapy Score (PRIS) to predict the response to AIT and identify eligible patients. A total of 110 patients diagnosed with allergic rhinitis with or without concomitant asthma were enrolled in this study. Before beginning sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT), patients were evaluated by analyzing clinical and laboratory parameters. A specific rating was assigned to each parameter to be combined in a total score named PRIS. At baseline (T0) and follow-up [after 12 (T12) and 24 months (T24) of SLIT], a Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) was used to calculate a mean symptom score (MSS). Finally, the percentage variation between the MSS at T0 and at T12 [ΔMSS-12(%)] and T24 [ΔMSS-24 (%)] was measured. We observed a significant improvement of symptoms at T12 and T24 compared to T0 in all groups undergoing SLIT. PRIS was effective in predicting ΔMSS-24 (%) in patients treated with single-allergen SLIT. In addition, PRIS was effective in predicting ΔMSS-24 (%) in both patients with only rhinitis and with concomitant asthma. PRIS assessment can represent a useful tool to individuate potential responders before SLIT prescription.

Indexed as

allergen immunotherapyallergic rhinitisbronchial asthmacomponent-resolved diagnosissublingual immunotherapy

Identifiers

PMID35625708
PMCPMC9138211
OpenAlexW4224246221

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.