Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625572›Full record

ArticleBiomolecules2022

Multi-TransDTI: Transformer for Drug-Target Interaction Prediction Based on Simple Universal Dictionaries with Multi-View Strategy.

Gan Wang, Xudong Zhang, Zheng Pan, Alfonso Rodríguez Patón, Shuang Wang, Tao Song, Yuanqiang Gu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomolecules, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Gan WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China.
Xudong ZhangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China.
Zheng PanDepartment of Accounting and Information Systems, University of Canterbury, Christchurch 8041, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-6067-626X
Alfonso Rodríguez PatónDepartment of Artificial Intelligence, Faculty of Computer Science, Polytechnical University of Madrid, Campus de Montegancedo, 28660 Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-7289-2114
Shuang WangCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China.
Tao SongCollege of Computer Science and Technology, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao 266580, China.ORCID 0000-0002-0130-3340
Yuanqiang GuQingdao Health Talents Development Center, Qingdao 266003, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prediction on drug-target interaction has always been a crucial link for drug discovery and repositioning, which have witnessed tremendous progress in recent years. Despite many efforts made, the existing representation learning or feature generation approaches of both drugs and proteins remain complicated as well as in high dimension. In addition, it is difficult for current methods to extract local important residues from sequence information while remaining focused on global structure. At the same time, massive data is not always easily accessible, which makes model learning from small datasets imminent. As a result, we propose an end-to-end learning model with SUPD and SUDD methods to encode drugs and proteins, which not only leave out the complicated feature extraction process but also greatly reduce the dimension of the embedding matrix. Meanwhile, we use a multi-view strategy with a transformer to extract local important residues of proteins for better representation learning. Finally, we evaluate our model on the BindingDB dataset in comparisons with different state-of-the-art models from comprehensive indicators. In results of 100% BindingDB, our AUC, AUPR, ACC, and F1-score reached 90.9%, 89.8%, 84.2%, and 84.3% respectively, which successively exceed the average values of other models by 2.2%, 2.3%, 2.6%, and 2.6%. Moreover, our model also generally surpasses their performance on 30% and 50% BindingDB datasets.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsDrug DevelopmentDrug DiscoveryDrug InteractionsProteinsProteinsdeep learningDTI predictionembedding dictionarymulti-view strategytransformer

Identifiers

PMID35625572
PMCPMC9138327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.