Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625434›Full record

ReviewBiology2022

Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) Scaffolds for Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Animal Models.

Maria Florencia Lezcano, Giannina Álvarez, Priscila Chuhuaicura, Karina Godoy, Josefa Alarcón, Francisca Acevedo, Iván Gareis, Fernando José Dias

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Pharmaceutics · 2022
    Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Maria Florencia LezcanoResearch Centre in Dental Sciences (CICO-UFRO), Dental School-Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-5033-9526
Giannina ÁlvarezResearch Centre in Dental Sciences (CICO-UFRO), Dental School-Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.
Priscila ChuhuaicuraDepartment of Integral Adults Dentistry, Dental School-Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-3160-9682
Karina GodoyScientific and Technological Bioresource Nucleus (BIOREN-UFRO), Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.
Josefa AlarcónResearch Centre in Dental Sciences (CICO-UFRO), Dental School-Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.
Francisca AcevedoDepartment of Basic Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0002-7060-0656
Iván GareisDepartamento de Bioingeniería, Facultad de Ingeniería, Universidad Nacional de Entre Ríos, Oro Verde 3100, Argentina.
Fernando José DiasDepartment of Integral Adults Dentistry, Dental School-Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de La Frontera, Temuco 4780000, Chile.ORCID 0000-0001-9945-9185
Universidad de La Frontera · CLUniversidad Nacional de Entre Ríos · AR

Funding

Agencia Nacional de Investigación y Desarrollo FONDECYT 11190300
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In the last two decades, artificial scaffolds for nerve regeneration have been produced using a variety of polymers. Polyhydroxybutyrate (PHB) is a natural polyester that can be easily processed and offer several advantages; hence, the purpose of this review is to provide a better understanding of the efficacy of therapeutic approaches involving PHB scaffolds in promoting peripheral nerve regeneration following nerve dissection in animal models. A systematic literature review was performed following the "Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses" (PRISMA) criteria. The revised databases were: Pub-Med/MEDLINE, Web of Science, Science Direct, EMBASE, and SCOPUS. Sixteen studies were included in this review. Different animal models and nerves were studied. Extension of nerve gaps reconnected by PHB scaffolds and the time periods of analysis were varied. The additives included in the scaffolds, if any, were growth factors, neurotrophins, other biopolymers, and neural progenitor cells. The analysis of the quality of the studies revealed good quality in general, with some aspects that could be improved. The analysis of the risk of bias revealed several weaknesses in all studies. The use of PHB as a biomaterial to prepare tubular scaffolds for nerve regeneration was shown to be promising. The incorporation of additives appears to be a trend that improves nerve regeneration. One of the main weaknesses of the reviewed articles was the lack of standardized experimentation on animals. It is recommended to follow the currently available guidelines to improve the design, avoid the risk of bias, maximize the quality of studies, and enhance translationality.

Indexed as

biomaterialneural repairperipheral nervous system—PNSPHA—polyhydroxyalkanoate

Identifiers

PMID35625434
PMCPMC9138984
OpenAlexW4280553314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.