Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625401›Full record

ArticleBiology2022

Andrea Pieroni, Naji Sulaiman, Renata Sõukand

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Andrea PieroniUniversity of Gastronomic Sciences, 12042 Pollenzo, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2302-6380
Naji SulaimanDepartment of Crop Sciences and Agroforestry, Faculty of Tropical AgriSciences, Campus Praha-Suchdol, Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, 16500 Prague, Czech Republic.ORCID 0000-0003-4293-2714
Renata SõukandDepartment of Environmental Sciences, Informatics and Statistics, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, 30172 Venezia, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-8723

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An ethnobotanical field study focusing on traditional wild greens (WGs) was carried out in Central Crete, Greece. Through thirty-one semi-structured interviews, a total of fifty-five wild green plants and their culinary uses and linguistic labels were documented; they were mostly consumed boiled (

Indexed as

ethnobotanyfood heritageGreeceMediterranean dietwild food plants

Identifiers

PMID35625401
PMCPMC9138012

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.