Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625347›Full record

ArticleAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Combined PK/PD Index May Be a More Appropriate PK/PD Index for Cefoperazone/Sulbactam against

Yingjie Zhou, Jing Zhang, Yuancheng Chen, Jufang Wu, Beining Guo, Xiaojie Wu, Yingyuan Zhang, Minggui Wang, Ru Ya, Hao Huang

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Efficacy of Cefoperazone Sulbactam in Patients withAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Editorial:Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yingjie ZhouInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Jing ZhangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0003-2966-9149
Yuancheng ChenInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0002-5731-9114
Jufang WuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Beining GuoInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Xiaojie WuInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Yingyuan ZhangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.
Minggui WangInstitute of Antibiotics, Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200040, China.ORCID 0000-0001-7682-5859
Ru YaYonghe Branch of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200436, China.
Hao HuangYonghe Branch of Huashan Hospital, Fudan University, Shanghai 200436, China.
Fudan University · CN

Funding

Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2012ZX09303004-001Ministry of Science and Technology of the People's Republic of China 2017ZX09304005National Natural Science Foundation of China 81202582Pfizer (China) CHN2008AI003 (9591)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cefoperazone/sulbactam (CPZ/SUL) is a β-lactam and β-lactamase inhibitor combination therapy for the treatment of respiratory tract infections. Using data from a prospective, multiple-center, open-label clinical trial in 54 patients with hospital-acquired pneumonia or ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii (Ab), we showed that a combined PK/PD index %(T > MICcpz*T > MICsul) is a more appropriate PK/PD index against Ab, compared to the PK/PD index (%T > MIC) for a single drug. For a 2 h infusion, the PK/PD cutoff of CPZ/SUL (2 g/1 g, q8h) for clinical and microbiological efficacy was 4/2 and 1/0.5 mg/L, respectively. The corresponding cumulative fraction of response was 46.5% and 25.3%, respectively. Results based on the combined PK/PD index were quite similar to that based on the joint probability of target attainment. The two drugs have interaction from the viewpoint of PK/PD. When the dose of one drug was too high, the PK/PD cutoff was often determined by another drug in which the dose was maintained. In most cases, sulbactam exerted the main effect against infection by Ab in the complex CPZ/SUL, which was similar to the literature reports. When the MIC of CPZ was 8, 16, or 32 mg/L, a CPZ/SUL 2 g/1 g (q8h), 2 g/2 g (q8h), or 2 g/2 g (q6h) (infusion was all 3 h) was recommended, respectively. A clinical efficacy and safety study to confirm simulation results is warranted.

Indexed as

Acinetobacter baumanniicefoperazonecombined PK/PD indexhospital-acquired pneumoniapharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamicsulbactam

Identifiers

PMID35625347
PMCPMC9138011
OpenAlexW4281401936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.