Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625294›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Routine Postoperative Antibiotic Prophylaxis Offers No Benefit after Hepatectomy-A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Anastasia Murtha-Lemekhova, Juri Fuchs, Miriam Teroerde, Ute Chiriac, Rosa Klotz, Daniel Hornuss, Jan Larmann, Markus A Weigand, Katrin Hoffmann

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Anastasia Murtha-LemekhovaDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-1294-7459
Juri FuchsDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-2484-8615
Miriam TeroerdeDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Ute ChiriacDepartment of Pharmacy, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-4288-1745
Rosa KlotzDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-4123-261X
Daniel HornussDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, Freiburg University Medical Center, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, 79106 Freiburg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0002-2621-3341
Jan LarmannDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3365-4572
Markus A WeigandDepartment of Anesthesiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Katrin HoffmannDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Heidelberg University Hospital, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.
Heidelberg University · DEGerman Society of Surgery · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundProphylactic antibiotics are frequently administered after major abdominal surgery including hepatectomies aiming to prevent infective complications. Yet, excessive use of antibiotics increases resistance in bacteria. The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to assess the efficacy of prophylactic antibiotics after hepatectomy (postoperative antibiotic prophylaxis, POA).

methodThis systematic review and meta-analysis were completed according to the current PRISMA guidelines. The protocol has been registered prior to data extraction (PROSPERO registration Nr: CRD42021288510). MEDLINE, Web of Science and CENTRAL were searched for clinical reports on POA in hepatectomy restrictions. A random-effects model was used for synthesis. Methodological quality was assessed with RoB2 and ROBINS-I. GRADE was used for the quality of evidence assessment.

resultsNine comparative studies comprising 2987 patients were identified: six randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and three retrospectives. POA did not lead to a reduction in postoperative infective complications or have an effect on liver-specific complications-post-hepatectomy liver failure and biliary leaks. POA over four or more days was associated with increased rates of deep surgical site infections compared to short-term administration for up to two days (OR 1.54; 95% CI [1.17;2.03];

conclusionRoutine POA cannot be recommended after hepatectomy since it does not reduce postoperative infection or liver-specific complications but contributes to resistance in bacteria. Studies into individualized risk-adapted antibiotic prophylaxis strategies are needed to further optimize perioperative treatment in liver surgery.

Indexed as

antibiotic resistanceantibioticsantibiotic stewardshiphepatectomyinfectionliver surgerymeta-analysissurgical site infection

Identifiers

PMID35625294
PMCPMC9138010
OpenAlexW4280626785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.