Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625209›Full record

ReviewAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland)2022

Green Tea (

Steve Kgotlelelo Mahlake, Caven Mguvane Mnisi, Cebisa Kumanda, Doctor Mziwenkosi Nhlanhla Mthiyane, Peter Kotsoana Montso

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Steve Kgotlelelo MahlakeDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Science, North-West University, Mafikeng 2745, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-3060-8271
Caven Mguvane MnisiDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Science, North-West University, Mafikeng 2745, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0003-1385-1093
Cebisa KumandaDepartment of Animal Sciences, University of Pretoria, Pretoria 0002, South Africa.
Doctor Mziwenkosi Nhlanhla MthiyaneDepartment of Animal Science, School of Agricultural Science, North-West University, Mafikeng 2745, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0001-8743-9304
Peter Kotsoana MontsoFood Security and Safety Focus Area, Faculty of Natural and Agricultural Science, North-West University, Mafikeng 2745, South Africa.ORCID 0000-0002-3344-1270
North-West University · ZAUniversity of Pretoria · ZA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The overuse and misuse of antibiotics in poultry feeds increase the total cost of production and compromise the quality of poultry products, which poses a serious threat to human health. Globally, health-conscious poultry consumers have long called for the alternate use of natural additives to mitigate the development and spread of multidrug resistant pathogens. Phytogenic plants, such as green tea (

Indexed as

antibioticsmeat qualityorganic productionphytogenic plantspoultry

Identifiers

PMID35625209
PMCPMC9137694
OpenAlexW4282942380

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.