Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625080›Full record

ArticleAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI2022

Body Weight Prediction from Linear Measurements of Icelandic Foals: A Machine Learning Approach.

Alicja Satoła, Jarosław Łuszczyński, Weronika Petrych, Krzysztof Satoła

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Animals : an open access journal from MDPI, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Alicja SatołaDepartment of Genetics, Animal Breeding and Ethology, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6609-4404
Jarosław ŁuszczyńskiDepartment of Genetics, Animal Breeding and Ethology, Faculty of Animal Science, University of Agriculture in Krakow, al. Mickiewicza 24/28, 30-059 Krakow, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-4686
Weronika PetrychPunktur Icelandic Horses, Debowy Gaj 47, 59-600 Lwówek Śląski, Poland.
Krzysztof SatołaIndependent Researcher, www.satola.net.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Knowledge of the body weight of horses permits breeders to provide appropriate feeding and care regimen and allows veterinarians to monitor the animals' health. It is not always possible to perform an accurate measurement of the body weight of horses using horse weighbridges, and therefore, new body weight formulas based on biometric measurements are required. The objective of this study is to develop and validate models for estimating body weight in Icelandic foals using machine learning methods. The study was conducted using 312 data records of body measurements on 24 Icelandic foals (12 colts and 12 fillies) from birth to 404 days of age. The best performing model was the polynomial model that included features such as heart girth, body circumference and cannon bone circumference. The mean percentage error for this model was 4.1% based on cross-validation and 3.8% for a holdout dataset. The body weight of Icelandic foals can also be estimated using a less complex model taking a single trait defined as the square of heart girth multiplied by body circumference. The mean percentage error for this model was up to 5% both for the training and the holdout datasets. The study results suggest that machine learning methods can be considered a useful tool for designing models for the estimation of body weight in horses.

Indexed as

equationsevaluationgrowthhorsesmodels

Identifiers

PMID35625080
PMCPMC9137917

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.