Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625038›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Discerning Developmental Dyscalculia and Neurodevelopmental Models of Numerical Cognition in a Disadvantaged Educational Context.

Flavia H Santos, Fabiana S Ribeiro, Ana Luiza Dias-Piovezana, Caterina Primi, Ann Dowker, Michael von Aster

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 6 institutions in 7 countries.

Flavia H SantosAffective, Behavioural and Cognitive Neuroscience, School of Psychology, University College Dublin, D04 V1W8 Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0003-2592-9038
Fabiana S RibeiroDepartment of Social Sciences, Faculty of Humanities, Education and Social Sciences, University of Luxembourg, L-4366 Esch-Sur-Alzette, Luxembourg.ORCID 0000-0003-1826-5253
Ana Luiza Dias-PiovezanaFaculty of Sciences, São Paulo State University, Bauru 17033-360, Brazil.
Caterina PrimiDepartment of Neuroscience, University of Florence, 50139 Florence, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1363-6855
Ann DowkerDepartment of Experimental Psychology, University of Oxford, Oxford OX2 6GG, UK.
Michael von AsterDepartment of Psychology, University of Potsdam, 14469 Potsdam, Germany.
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) · BRUniversity College Dublin · IEUniversity of Florence · ITUniversity of Luxembourg · LUUniversity of Oxford · GBUniversity of Potsdam · DE

Funding

São Paulo Research Foundation 04/11.067-0
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Developmental Dyscalculia (DD) signifies a failure in representing quantities, which impairs the performance of basic math operations and schooling achievement during childhood. The lack of specificity in assessment measures and respective cut-offs are the most challenging factors to identify children with DD, particularly in disadvantaged educational contexts. This research is focused on a numerical cognition battery for children, designed to diagnose DD through 12 subtests. The aims of the present study were twofold: to examine the prevalence of DD in a country with generally low educational attainment, by comparing z-scores and percentiles, and to test three neurodevelopmental models of numerical cognition based on performance in this battery. Participants were 304 Brazilian school children aged 7-12 years of both sexes (143 girls), assessed by the Zareki-R. Performances on subtests and the total score increase with age without gender differences. The prevalence of DD was 4.6% using the fifth percentile and increased to 7.4% via z-score (in total 22 out of 304 children were diagnosed with DD). We suggest that a minus 1.5 standard deviation in the total score of the Zareki-R is a useful criterion in the clinical or educational context. Nevertheless, a percentile ≤ 5 seems more suitable for research purposes, especially in developing countries because the socioeconomic environment or/and educational background are strong confounder factors to diagnosis. The four-factor structure, based on von Aster and Shalev's model of numerical cognition (Number Sense, Number Comprehension, Number Production and Calculation), was the best model, with significant correlations ranging from 0.89 to 0.97 at the 0.001 level.

Indexed as

developmental dyscalculianeuropsychologyprevalence

Identifiers

PMID35625038
PMCPMC9139865
OpenAlexW4280567969

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.