Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35625018›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Elderly Gliobastoma Patients: The Impact of Surgery and Adjuvant Treatments on Survival: A Single Institution Experience.

Francesco Bruno, Alessia Pellerino, Edoardo Pronello, Rosa Palmiero, Luca Bertero, Cristina Mantovani, Andrea Bianconi, Antonio Melcarne, Diego Garbossa, Roberta Rudà

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.2field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Observational
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco BrunoDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Alessia PellerinoDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-3243-0059
Edoardo PronelloDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Rosa PalmieroDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Luca BerteroPathology Unit, Department of Medical Sciences, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0001-9887-7668
Cristina MantovaniDivision of Radiotherapy, Department of Oncology, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Andrea BianconiDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-1014-0731
Antonio MelcarneDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Diego GarbossaDivision of Neurosurgery, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-2692-7133
Roberta RudàDivision of Neuro-Oncology, Department of Neuroscience, University and City of Health and Science, 10100 Turin, Italy.
Piedmont Reference Center for Epidemiology and Cancer Prevention · ITUniversità degli Studi del Piemonte Orientale “Amedeo Avogadro” · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction. Elderly glioblastoma (GBM) patients often show limited response to treatment and poor outcome. Here, we provide a case series of elderly GBM patients from our Institution, in whom we assessed the clinical characteristics, feasibility of surgical resection, response to adjuvant treatments, and outcome, along with the impact of comorbidities and clinical status on survival. Patients and Methods. We included patients ≥ 65-year-old. We collected information about clinical and molecular features, extent of resection, adjuvant treatments, treatment-related complications, and outcome. Results. We included 135 patients. Median age was 71 years. In total, 127 patients (94.0%) had a Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) ≥70 and 61/135 (45.2%) a Charlson Comorbidity Score (CCI) > 3. MGMTp methylation was found in 70/135 (51.9%). Subtotal resections (STRs), gross-total resections (GTRs), and biopsies were 102 (75.6%), 10 (7.4%) and 23 (17.0%), respectively. Median progression-free survival and overall survival (mOS) were 8.0 and 10.5 months for the whole cohort. Notably, GTR and radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide in patients with MGMTp methylation were associated with significantly longer mOS (32.8 and 44.8 months, respectively). In a multivariable analysis, risk of death was affected by STR vs. GTR (HR 2.8, p = 0.002), MGMTp methylation (HR 0.55, p = 0.007), and KPS at baseline ≥70 (HR 0.43, p = 0.031). Conversely, CCI and post-surgical complications were not significant. Conclusions. Elderly GBM patients often have a dismal prognosis. However, it is possible to identify a subgroup with favourable clinical and molecular features, who benefit from GTR and radio-chemotherapy with temozolomide. A comprehensive prognostic score is needed to guide treatment modality and predict the outcome.

Indexed as

adjuvant treatmentscomorbidityelderly patientsextent of resectionglioblastomagross-total resectionMGMTp methylationoutcomeradio-chemotherapysurvival

Identifiers

PMID35625018
PMCPMC9139732
OpenAlexW4280604673

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.