Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624996›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Neurological Pupil Index for the Early Prediction of Outcome in Severe Acute Brain Injury Patients.

Federico Romagnosi, Adriano Bernini, Filippo Bongiovanni, Carolina Iaquaniello, John-Paul Miroz, Giuseppe Citerio, Fabio Silvio Taccone, Mauro Oddo

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Prediction of neurocritical care intensity through automated infrared pupillometry and transcranial doppler in blunt traumatic brain injury: the NOPE study.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2024
    Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Application of Pupillometry in Neurocritical Patients.Journal of personalized medicine · 2023
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Federico RomagnosiNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Adriano BerniniNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0003-0207-0064
Filippo BongiovanniNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Carolina IaquanielloNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
John-Paul MirozNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.
Giuseppe CiterioDepartment of Neuroscience ASST-Monza, University of Milano-Bicocca, 20900 Monza, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-5374-3161
Fabio Silvio TacconeDepartment of Intensive Care Medicine, Erasme Hospital, Université Libre de Bruxelles, 1050 Brussels, Belgium.
Mauro OddoNeuroscience Critical Care Group, Department of Intensive Care Medicine, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois (CHUV), Lausanne University Hospital, University of Lausanne, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-6155-2525

Funding

Swiss National Science Foundation 31NE30_173675Swiss National Science Foundation 32003B_188501
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In this study, we examined the early value of automated quantitative pupillary examination, using the Neurological Pupil index (NPi), to predict the long-term outcome of acute brain injured (ABI) patients. We performed a single-centre retrospective study (October 2016−March 2019) in ABI patients who underwent NPi measurement during the first 3 days following brain insult. We examined the performance of NPi—alone or in combination with other baseline demographic (age) and radiologic (CT midline shift) predictors—to prognosticate unfavourable 6-month outcome (Glasgow Outcome Scale 1−3). A total of 145 severely brain-injured subjects (65 traumatic brain injury, TBI; 80 non-TBI) were studied. At each time point tested, NPi <3 was highly predictive of unfavourable outcome, with highest specificity (100% (90−100)) at day 3 (sensitivity 24% (15−35), negative predictive value 36% (34−39)). The addition of NPi, from day 1 following ABI to age and cerebral CT scan, provided the best prognostic performance (AUROC curve 0.85 vs. 0.78 without NPi, p = 0.008; DeLong test) for 6-month neurological outcome prediction. NPi, assessed at the early post-injury phase, has a superior ability to predict unfavourable long-term neurological outcomes in severely brain-injured patients. The added prognostic value of NPi was most significant when complemented with baseline demographic and radiologic information.

Indexed as

acute brain injurymidline shiftneurological prognosisNeurological Pupil indexquantitative pupillometry

Identifiers

PMID35624996
PMCPMC9139348

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.