Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624990›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Aneurysm-on-a-Chip: Setting Flow Parameters for Microfluidic Endothelial Cultures Based on Computational Fluid Dynamics Modeling of Intracranial Aneurysms.

Aisen Vivas, Julia Mikhal, Gabriela M Ong, Anna Eigenbrodt, Andries D van der Meer, Rene Aquarius, Bernard J Geurts, Hieronymus D Boogaarts

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 24% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Engineering in vitro vascular microsystems.Microsystems & nanoengineering · 2025
    Review
  4. Engineering Organ-on-a-Chip Systems for Vascular Diseases.Arteriosclerosis, thrombosis, and vascular biology · 2023
    Review
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aisen VivasApplied Stem Cell Technologies, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0003-1721-8682
Julia MikhalMultiscale Modeling and Simulation Group, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Gabriela M OngMultiscale Modeling and Simulation Group, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Anna EigenbrodtApplied Stem Cell Technologies, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Andries D van der MeerApplied Stem Cell Technologies, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-8761-4077
Rene AquariusDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0968-6884
Bernard J GeurtsMultiscale Modeling and Simulation Group, Department of Applied Mathematics, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, The Netherlands.
Hieronymus D BoogaartsDepartment of Neurosurgery, Radboud University Medical Center, 6525 XZ Nijmegen, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5855-2447
University of Twente · NLRadboud University Nijmegen · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intracranial aneurysms are pouch-like extrusions from the vessels at the base of the brain which can rupture and cause a subarachnoid hemorrhage. The pathophysiological mechanism of aneurysm formation is thought to be a consequence of blood flow (hemodynamic) induced changes on the endothelium. In this study, the results of a personalized aneurysm-on-a-chip model using patient-specific flow parameters and patient-specific cells are presented. CT imaging was used to calculate CFD parameters using an immersed boundary method. A microfluidic device either cultured with human umbilical vein endothelial cells (HUVECs) or human induced pluripotent stem cell-derived endothelial cells (hiPSC-EC) was used. Both types of endothelial cells were exposed for 24 h to either 0.03 Pa or 1.5 Pa shear stress, corresponding to regions of low shear and high shear in the computational aneurysm model, respectively. As a control, both cell types were also cultured under static conditions for 24 h as a control. Both HUVEC and hiPSC-EC cultures presented as confluent monolayers with no particular cell alignment in static or low shear conditions. Under high shear conditions HUVEC elongated and aligned in the direction of the flow. HiPSC-EC exhibited reduced cell numbers, monolayer gap formation and cells with aberrant, spread-out morphology. Future research should focus on hiPSC-EC stabilization to allow personalized intracranial aneurysm models.

Indexed as

aneurysmaneurysm on a chipcomputational fluid dynamicsendothelial cellsintracranial aneurysmorgan on a chip

Identifiers

PMID35624990
PMCPMC9139202
OpenAlexW4229035871

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.