Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624983›Full record

ArticleBrain sciences2022

Different Approximation Methods for Calculation of Integrated Information Coefficient in the Brain during Instrumental Learning.

Ivan Nazhestkin, Olga Svarnik

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain sciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 60% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ivan NazhestkinMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 1 "A" Kerchenskaya St., 117303 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0003-2482-7742
Olga SvarnikMoscow Institute of Physics and Technology, 1 "A" Kerchenskaya St., 117303 Moscow, Russia.ORCID 0000-0002-0439-4532
Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology · RURussian Academy of Sciences · RU

Funding

Russian Foundation for Basic Research 20-34-90023
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The amount of integrated information, Φ, proposed in an integrated information theory (IIT) is useful to describe the degree of brain adaptation to the environment. However, its computation cannot be precisely performed for a reasonable time for time-series spike data collected from a large count of neurons.. Therefore, Φ was only used to describe averaged activity of a big group of neurons, and the behavior of small non-brain systems. In this study, we reported on ways for fast and precise Φ calculation using different approximation methods for Φ calculation in neural spike data, and checked the capability of Φ to describe a degree of adaptation in brain neural networks. We show that during instrumental learning sessions, all applied approximation methods reflect temporal trends of Φ in the rat hippocampus. The value of Φ is positively correlated with the number of successful acts performed by a rat. We also show that only one subgroup of neurons modulates their Φ during learning. The obtained results pave the way for application of Φ to investigate plasticity in the brain during the acquisition of new tasks.

Indexed as

adaptationbrainentropyhippocampusinformation processingintegrated information theorylearning

Identifiers

PMID35624983
PMCPMC9138974
OpenAlexW4225326070

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.