Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624656›Full record

ArticleBiosensors2022

An Artifact-Resistant Feature SKNAER for Quantifying the Burst of Skin Sympathetic Nerve Activity Signal.

Yantao Xing, Yike Zhang, Zhijun Xiao, Chenxi Yang, Jiayi Li, Chang Cui, Jing Wang, Hongwu Chen, Jianqing Li, Chengyu Liu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biosensors, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yantao XingSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0002-4951-3451
Yike ZhangDivision of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Zhijun XiaoSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Chenxi YangSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.ORCID 0000-0003-0180-4126
Jiayi LiSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Chang CuiDivision of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Jing WangDivision of Nephrology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Hongwu ChenDivision of Cardiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Jianqing LiSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Chengyu LiuSchool of Instrument Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing 210096, China.
Southeast University · CNJiangsu Province Hospital · CN

Funding

National Key Research and Development Program of China 2019YFE0113800National Natural Science Foundation of China 62171123,81871444, 62001111 and 62071241Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China BK20190014, BK20192004 and BK20200364
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Evaluation of sympathetic nerve activity (SNA) using skin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA) signal has attracted interest in recent studies. However, signal noises may obstruct the accurate location for the burst of SKNA, leading to the quantification error of the signal. In this study, we use the Teager−Kaiser energy (TKE) operator to preprocess the SKNA signal, and then candidates of burst areas were segmented by an envelope-based method. Since the burst of SKNA can also be discriminated by the high-frequency component in QRS complexes of electrocardiogram (ECG), a strategy was designed to reject their influence. Finally, a feature of the SKNA energy ratio (SKNAER) was proposed for quantifying the SKNA. The method was verified by both sympathetic nerve stimulation and hemodialysis experiments compared with traditional heart rate variability (HRV) and a recently developed integral skin sympathetic nerve activity (iSKNA) method. The results showed that SKNAER correlated well with HRV features (r = 0.60 with the standard deviation of NN intervals, 0.67 with low frequency/high frequency, 0.47 with very low frequency) and the average of iSKNA (r = 0.67). SKNAER improved the detection accuracy for the burst of SKNA, with 98.2% for detection rate and 91.9% for precision, inducing increases of 3.7% and 29.1% compared with iSKNA (detection rate: 94.5% (p < 0.01), precision: 62.8% (p < 0.001)). The results from the hemodialysis experiment showed that SKNAER had more significant differences than aSKNA in the long-term SNA evaluation (p < 0.001 vs. p = 0.07 in the fourth period, p < 0.01 vs. p = 0.11 in the sixth period). The newly developed feature may play an important role in continuously monitoring SNA and keeping potential for further clinical tests.

Indexed as

ArtifactsSympathetic Nervous SystemElectrocardiographyHeart RateSkinelectrocardiogram (ECG)electrodesskin sympathetic nerve activity (SKNA)sympathetic activity (SNA)

Identifiers

PMID35624656
PMCPMC9138869
OpenAlexW4280648915

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.