Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624516›Full record

Trial reportRespiratory research2022

Safety of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines in patients with allergic diseases.

Chao Cao, Feng Qiu, Chengcheng Lou, Lingling Fang, Fang Liu, Jingjing Zhong, Weijie Sun, Weiping Ding, Xiaopin Yu, Qinhong Xu and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Respiratory research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Chao CaoDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Feng QiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Chengcheng LouDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Lingling FangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Fang LiuDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Jingjing ZhongDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Weijie SunDepartment of Clinical Laboratory, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Weiping DingDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Medicine, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Xiaopin YuDepartment of Prevention and Healthy Care, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Qinhong XuDepartment of Nursing, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China.
Ran WangDepartment of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China. ranwangtjmu@hotmail.com.
Liemin RuanDepartment of Mental Health, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China. lmruan@tom.com.
Qifa SongDepartment of Central Laboratory, Ningbo First Hospital, Ningbo, China. qifasong@126.com.
Ningbo First Hospital · CNFirst Affiliated Hospital of Anhui Medical University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundConsidering the considerable prevalence of allergic disease in the general population, an urgent need exists for inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines that can be safely administered to those subjects.

methodsThis retrospective cohort study including 1926 participants who received inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccines, compared their local and systemic reactions in 7 days after each dose of inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine, and anti-SARS-CoV-2 IgG after vaccination in all participants.

resultsPain at the injection site within seven days after the first injection was the most commonly reported local reaction, occurring in 31.0% of the patients with allergic disease and 18.9% in the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). After the first dose, systemic events were more frequently reported in patients with allergic disease than control group (30.2% vs. 22.9%, P < 0.001). After the second dose, systemic events occurred less often, affecting 17.1% of the patients with allergic disease and 11.1% of the control group (P < 0.002). The occurrence of fatigue, vertigo, diarrhea, skin rash, sore throat were the most frequent systemic reactions. Overall, a lower incidence of local and systemic reactive events was observed after the second dose than the first dose in patients with allergic disease and control group. Nearly all participants had positive IgG antibodies, and participants with allergic disease had higher frequencies compared with control group (100.0 vs.99.4%).

conclusionsAlthough local and systemic reactions were more frequently reported in patients with allergic disease than control group, administration of the inactivated SARS-CoV-2 vaccine was safe and well tolerated by all participants; no participants experienced a serious adverse event, and none were hospitalized.

trial registrationChinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2100048549. Registered Jul 10, 2021.

Indexed as

COVID-19Viral VaccinesCOVID-19 VaccinesHumansImmunoglobulin GRetrospective StudiesSARS-CoV-2COVID-19 VaccinesImmunoglobulin GViral VaccinesAllergic diseasesImmunogenicitySafetySARS-CoV-2Vaccine

Identifiers

PMID35624516
PMCPMC9137440
OpenAlexW4281731981

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.