Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624466›Full record

ArticleMolecular cancer2022

AP4 suppresses DNA damage, chromosomal instability and senescence via inducing MDC1/Mediator of DNA damage Checkpoint 1 and repressing MIR22HG/miR-22-3p.

Jinjiang Chou, Markus Kaller, Stephanie Jaeckel, Matjaz Rokavec, Heiko Hermeking

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular cancer, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 34 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jinjiang ChouExperimental and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Strasse 36, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Markus KallerExperimental and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Strasse 36, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Stephanie JaeckelExperimental and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Strasse 36, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Matjaz RokavecExperimental and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Strasse 36, 80337, Munich, Germany.
Heiko HermekingExperimental and Molecular Pathology, Institute of Pathology, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Thalkirchner Strasse 36, 80337, Munich, Germany. heiko.hermeking@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEDeutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAP4 (TFAP4) encodes a basic helix-loop-helix leucine zipper (bHLH-LZ) transcription factor and is a direct target gene of the oncogenic transcription factor c-MYC. Here, we set out to determine the relevance of AP4 in human colorectal cancer (CRC) cells.

methodsA CRISPR/Cas9 approach was employed to generate AP4-deficient CRC cell lines with inducible expression of c-MYC. Colony formation, β-gal staining, immunofluorescence, comet and homologous recombination (HR) assays and RNA-Seq analysis were used to determine the effects of AP4 inactivation. qPCR and qChIP analyses was performed to validate differentially expressed AP4 targets. Expression data from CRC cohorts was subjected to bioinformatics analyses. Immunohistochemistry was used to evaluate AP4 targets in vivo. Ap4-deficient APC

resultsInactivation of AP4 in CRC cell lines resulted in increased spontaneous and c-MYC-induced DNA damage, chromosomal instability (CIN) and cellular senescence. AP4-deficient cells displayed increased expression of the long non-coding RNA MIR22HG, which encodes miR-22-3p and was directly repressed by AP4. Furthermore, Mediator of DNA damage Checkpoint 1 (MDC1), a central component of the DNA damage response and a known target of miR-22-3p, displayed decreased expression in AP4-deficient cells. Accordingly, MDC1 was directly induced by AP4 and indirectly by AP4-mediated repression of miR-22-3p. Adenomas and organoids from Ap4-deficient APC

conclusionsIn summary, AP4, miR-22-3p and MDC1 form a conserved and coherent, regulatory feed-forward loop to promote DNA repair, which suppresses DNA damage, senescence and CIN, and contributes to 5-FU resistance. These findings explain how elevated AP4 expression contributes to development and chemo-resistance of colorectal cancer after c-MYC activation.

Indexed as

Colorectal NeoplasmsMicroRNAsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingAnimalsCell Cycle ProteinsChromosomal InstabilityDNA DamageFluorouracilGene Expression Regulation, NeoplasticHumansMiceTranscription FactorsAdaptor Proteins, Signal TransducingCell Cycle ProteinsFluorouracilMDC1 protein, humanMicroRNAsMIRN22 microRNA, humanTranscription FactorsAP4Chemo-resistancec-MYCColorectal cancerDNA damageDNA repairHomologous recombinationMDC1miR-22-3pMIR22HG

Identifiers

PMID35624466
PMCPMC9137087
OpenAlexW4282032900

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.