ArticleBMC medical imaging2022
Deep transfer learning to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest X-rays.
Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative estimation of pleural effusion volume on chest radiography: comparison of radiologists and a general-purpose multimodal AI model using CT as the reference standard.European radiology experimental · 2026Observational
- Identifying predictor factors for asthma using machine learning: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Pleural Diseases: Current Applications and Next Steps.Thoracic research and practice · 2026Article
- Automated evaluation of pulmonary lesion changes on chest radiograph during follow-up using semantic segmentation.Diagnostic and interventional radiology (Ankara, Turkey) · 2026Article
- PulmoX-Net: a channel-attention enhanced deep learning model for multi-class pulmonary pathology classification in chest radiography.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Designing a computer-assisted diagnosis system for cardiomegaly detection and radiology report generation.PLOS digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- DF-DM: A foundational process model for multimodal data fusion in the artificial intelligence era.Research square · 2024Article
- Deep Learning in Breast Cancer Imaging: State of the Art and Recent Advancements in Early 2024.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Automated detection and segmentation of pleural effusion on ultrasound images using an Attention U-net.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- DCNAS-Net: deformation convolution and neural architecture search detection network for bone marrow oedema.BMC medical imaging · 2023Article
- Chest X-ray in Emergency Radiology: What Artificial Intelligence Applications Are Available?Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Application of artificial intelligence for automatic cataract staging based on anterior segment images: comparing automatic segmentation approaches to manual segmentation.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence method based on multi-feature fusion for automatic macular edema (ME) classification on spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) images.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2023Article
- Artificial intelligence in clinical medicine: catalyzing a sustainable global healthcare paradigm.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2023Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeThe detection of pleural effusion in chest radiography is crucial for doctors to make timely treatment decisions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used the MIMIC-CXR database to develop a deep learning model to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest radiographs.
methodsThe Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Chest X-ray (MIMIC-CXR) dataset was divided into patients 'with' or 'without' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The label of pleural effusion severity was obtained from the extracted COPD radiology reports and classified into four categories: no effusion, small effusion, moderate effusion, and large effusion. A total of 200 datasets were randomly sampled to manually check each item and determine whether the tags are correct. A professional doctor re-tagged these items as a verification cohort without knowing their previous tags. The learning models include eight common network structures including Resnet, DenseNet, and GoogleNET. Three data processing methods (no sampling, downsampling, and upsampling) and two loss algorithms (focal loss and cross-entropy loss) were used for unbalanced data. The Neural Network Intelligence tool was applied to train the model. Receiver operating characteristic curves, Area under the curve, and confusion matrix were employed to evaluate the model results. Grad-CAM was used for model interpretation.
resultsAmong the 8533 patients, 15,620 chest X-rays with clearly marked pleural effusion severity were obtained (no effusion, 5685; small effusion, 4877; moderate effusion, 3657; and large effusion, 1401). The error rate of the manual check label was 6.5%, and the error rate of the doctor's relabeling was 11.0%. The highest accuracy rate of the optimized model was 73.07. The micro-average AUCs of the testing and validation cohorts was 0.89 and 0.90, respectively, and their macro-average AUCs were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. The AUC of the distinguishing results of each class and the other three classes were 0.95 and 0.94, 0.76 and 0.83, 0.85 and 0.83, and 0.87 and 0.93.
conclusionThe deep transfer learning model can grade the severity of pleural effusion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.