Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624426›Full record

ArticleBMC medical imaging2022

Deep transfer learning to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest X-rays.

Tao Huang, Rui Yang, Longbin Shen, Aozi Feng, Li Li, Ningxia He, Shuna Li, Liying Huang, Jun Lyu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC medical imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Pneumothorax and Hemothorax: Practical Approaches for Radiologists.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2026
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Tao Huang *Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Rui Yang *Department of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Longbin ShenDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Aozi FengDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Li LiDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Ningxia HeDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Shuna LiDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Liying HuangDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China.
Jun LyuDepartment of Clinical Research, The First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University, Guangzhou, 510630, China. lyujun2020@jnu.edu.cn.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe detection of pleural effusion in chest radiography is crucial for doctors to make timely treatment decisions for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. We used the MIMIC-CXR database to develop a deep learning model to quantify pleural effusion severity in chest radiographs.

methodsThe Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care Chest X-ray (MIMIC-CXR) dataset was divided into patients 'with' or 'without' chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The label of pleural effusion severity was obtained from the extracted COPD radiology reports and classified into four categories: no effusion, small effusion, moderate effusion, and large effusion. A total of 200 datasets were randomly sampled to manually check each item and determine whether the tags are correct. A professional doctor re-tagged these items as a verification cohort without knowing their previous tags. The learning models include eight common network structures including Resnet, DenseNet, and GoogleNET. Three data processing methods (no sampling, downsampling, and upsampling) and two loss algorithms (focal loss and cross-entropy loss) were used for unbalanced data. The Neural Network Intelligence tool was applied to train the model. Receiver operating characteristic curves, Area under the curve, and confusion matrix were employed to evaluate the model results. Grad-CAM was used for model interpretation.

resultsAmong the 8533 patients, 15,620 chest X-rays with clearly marked pleural effusion severity were obtained (no effusion, 5685; small effusion, 4877; moderate effusion, 3657; and large effusion, 1401). The error rate of the manual check label was 6.5%, and the error rate of the doctor's relabeling was 11.0%. The highest accuracy rate of the optimized model was 73.07. The micro-average AUCs of the testing and validation cohorts was 0.89 and 0.90, respectively, and their macro-average AUCs were 0.86 and 0.89, respectively. The AUC of the distinguishing results of each class and the other three classes were 0.95 and 0.94, 0.76 and 0.83, 0.85 and 0.83, and 0.87 and 0.93.

conclusionThe deep transfer learning model can grade the severity of pleural effusion.

Indexed as

Pleural EffusionPulmonary Disease, Chronic ObstructiveHumansMachine LearningRadiographyRadiography, ThoracicX-RaysChest radiographsDeep learningMIMIC-CXRPleural effusionSeverityX-rays

Identifiers

PMID35624426
PMCPMC9137166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.