Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624412›Full record

ArticleBMC ecology and evolution2022

Comparative genomics highlight the importance of lineage-specific gene families in evolutionary divergence of the coral genus, Montipora.

Yuki Yoshioka, Go Suzuki, Yuna Zayasu, Hiroshi Yamashita, Chuya Shinzato

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC ecology and evolution, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Nearly T2T, phased genome assemblies of corals reveal haplotype diversity and the evolutionary process of gene expansion.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2025
    Article
  6. Mitogenomic characterization and phylogenetic positioning ofMitochondrial DNA. Part B, Resources · 2025
    Article
  7. Evolution of the Cdk4/6-Cdkn2 system in invertebrates.Genes to cells : devoted to molecular & cellular mechanisms · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Genomic and transcriptomic analyses illuminate the molecular basis of the unique lifestyle of a tubeworm, Lamellibrachia satsuma.DNA research : an international journal for rapid publication of reports on genes and genomes · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Yuki YoshiokaAtmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan.
Go SuzukiFisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Japan.
Yuna ZayasuMarine Genomics Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Onna, Okinawa, Japan.
Hiroshi YamashitaFisheries Technology Institute, Japan Fisheries Research and Education Agency, Ishigaki, Okinawa, Japan.
Chuya ShinzatoAtmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, Kashiwa, Chiba, Japan. c.shinzato@aori.u-tokyo.ac.jp.
The University of Tokyo · JPOkinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundScleractinian corals of the genus Montipora (Anthozoa, Cnidaria) possess some unusual biological traits, such as vertical transmission of algal symbionts; however, the genetic bases for those traits remain unknown. We performed extensive comparative genomic analyses among members of the family Acroporidae (Montipora, Acropora, and Astreopora) to explore genomic novelties that might explain unique biological traits of Montipora using improved genome assemblies and gene predictions for M. cactus, M. efflorescens and Astreopora myriophthalma.

resultsWe obtained genomic data for the three species of comparable high quality to other published coral genomes. Comparative genomic analyses revealed that the gene families restricted to Montipora are significantly more numerous than those of Acropora and Astreopora, but their functions are largely unknown. The number of gene families specifically expanded in Montipora was much lower than the number specifically expanded in Acropora. In addition, we found that evolutionary rates of the Montipora-specific gene families were significantly higher than other gene families shared with Acropora and/or Astreopora. Of 40 gene families under positive selection (Ka/Ks ratio > 1) in Montipora, 30 were specifically detected in Montipora-specific gene families. Comparative transcriptomic analysis of early life stages of Montipora, which possesses maternally inherited symbionts, and Acropora, which lacks them, revealed that most gene families continuously expressed in Montipora, but not expressed in Acropora do not have orthologs in Acropora. Among the 30 Montipora-specific gene families under positive selection, 27 are expressed in early life stages.

conclusionsLineage-specific gene families were important to establish the genus Montipora, particularly genes expressed throughout early life stages, which under positive selection, gave rise to biological traits unique to Montipora. Our findings highlight evolutionarily acquired genomic bases that may support symbiosis in these stony corals and provide novel insights into mechanisms of coral-algal symbiosis, the physiological foundation of coral reefs.

Indexed as

AnthozoaAnimalsBiological EvolutionCoral ReefsGenomicsSymbiosisComparative genomicsCoralsEvolutionMontiporaRapidly evolving genesSymbiosisTranscriptomeVertical transmission of algal symbionts

Identifiers

PMID35624412
PMCPMC9145168
OpenAlexW4282020997

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.