Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624334›Full record

ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2022

Enhanced 4D Flow MRI-Based CFD with Adaptive Mesh Refinement for Flow Dynamics Assessment in Coarctation of the Aorta.

Labib Shahid, James Rice, Haben Berhane, Cynthia Rigsby, Joshua Robinson, Lindsay Griffin, Michael Markl, Alejandro Roldán-Alzate

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Applications of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Congenital Heart Disease: A Review.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Computational fluid dynamics of bladder voiding using 3D dynamic MRI.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Labib ShahidDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Room 2476 WIMR II, Madison, WI, 53705, USA. lshahid@wisc.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8916-5802
James RiceDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Room 2476 WIMR II, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Haben BerhaneDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Cynthia RigsbyDepartment of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Joshua RobinsonDepartment of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Lindsay GriffinDepartment of Medical Imaging, Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, IL, USA.
Michael MarklDepartment of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, USA.
Alejandro Roldán-AlzateDepartment of Mechanical Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, 1111 Highland Ave, Room 2476 WIMR II, Madison, WI, 53705, USA.
Lurie Children's Hospital · USNorthwestern University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · USUniversity of Wisconsin System · US

Funding

American Heart Association-American Stroke Association 19TPA34850066
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

4D Flow MRI is a diagnostic tool that can visualize and quantify patient-specific hemodynamics and help interventionalists optimize treatment strategies for repairing coarctation of the aorta (COA). Despite recent developments in 4D Flow MRI, shortcomings include phase-offset errors, limited spatiotemporal resolution, aliasing, inaccuracies due to slow aneurysmal flows, and distortion of images due to metallic artifact from vascular stents. To address these limitations, we developed a framework utilizing Computational Fluid Dynamics (CFD) with Adaptive Mesh Refinement (AMR) that enhances 4D Flow MRI visualization/quantification. We applied this framework to five pediatric patients with COA, providing in-vivo and in-silico datasets, pre- and post-intervention. These two data sets were compared and showed that CFD flow rates were within 9.6% of 4D Flow MRI, which is within a clinically acceptable range. CFD simulated slow aneurysmal flow, which MRI failed to capture due to high relative velocity encoding (V

Indexed as

Aortic CoarctationHydrodynamicsBlood Flow VelocityChildHemodynamicsHumansImaging, Three-DimensionalMagnetic Resonance ImagingSurgical Mesh4D flow MRIAdaptive mesh refinementComputational fluid dynamicsCongenital heart diseasePatient-specific

Identifiers

PMID35624334
PMCPMC11034844
OpenAlexW4281705231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.