Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35624302›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2022

LCA and negative emission potential of retrofitted cement plants under oxyfuel conditions at high biogenic fuel shares.

Otavio Cavalett, Marcos D B Watanabe, Kristina Fleiger, Volker Hoenig, Francesco Cherubini

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. The potential of green ammonia in the de-fossilization of the steel, glass and cement industries.Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Otavio CavalettDepartment of Energy and Process Engineering, Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway. otavio.cavalett@ntnu.no.
Marcos D B WatanabeDepartment of Energy and Process Engineering, Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.
Kristina FleigerVDZ gGmbH, Toulouser Allee 71, 40476, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Volker HoenigVDZ gGmbH, Toulouser Allee 71, 40476, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Francesco CherubiniDepartment of Energy and Process Engineering, Industrial Ecology Programme, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Høgskoleringen 1, 7491, Trondheim, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The implementation of oxyfuel carbon capture and storage technologies in combination with use of alternative fuels comprising high biogenic shares is promoted as an attractive climate change mitigation option for the cement sector to achieve low or even negative carbon emissions. Here, we perform a prospective life cycle assessment of two state-of-the art cement plants, one in Sweden and one in Germany, under conventional and retrofitted oxyfuel conditions considering alternative fuel mixes with increasing bio-based fractions of forest residues or dedicated bioenergy crops. The analysis also considers effects of the projected changes in the electricity systems up to 2050. Retrofitting the cement plants to oxyfuel reduces climate change impacts between 74 and 91%, while with additional use of biomass as alternative fuel the cement plants reach negative emission between - 24 and - 169 gCO

Indexed as

CarbonClimate ChangeBiomassElectricityHumansProspective StudiesCarbon

Identifiers

PMID35624302
PMCPMC9142509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.