Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623906›Full record

ArticleVaccine2022

Measuring parents' readiness to vaccinate themselves and their children against COVID-19.

Franziska Rees, Mattis Geiger, Lau Lilleholt, Ingo Zettler, Cornelia Betsch, Robert Böhm, Oliver Wilhelm

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Vaccine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Vaccination Readiness and Conspiracy Beliefs to Virus-Based Diseases: A Validation Study.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. COVID-19 Parental Vaccine Hesitancy: The Role of Trust in Science and Conspiracy Beliefs.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Franziska ReesInstitute for Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: franziska.rees@uni-ulm.de.
Mattis GeigerInstitute for Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany; Department of Implementation Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany. Electronic address: mattis.geiger@bnitm.de.
Lau LilleholtDepartment of Psychology and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Centre for Experimental-Philosophical Study of Discrimination, Department of Political Science, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark. Electronic address: llj@psy.ku.dk.
Ingo ZettlerDepartment of Psychology and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: ingo.zettler@psy.ku.dk.
Cornelia BetschDepartment of Implementation Research, Bernhard Nocht Institute for Tropical Medicine, Hamburg, Germany; Chair of Health Communication, University of Erfurt, Erfurt, Germany. Electronic address: cornelia.betsch@uni-erfurt.de.
Robert BöhmDepartment of Psychology and Copenhagen Center for Social Data Science (SODAS), University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark; Department of Occupational, Economic, and Social Psychology, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. Electronic address: robert.boehm@univie.ac.at.
Oliver WilhelmInstitute for Psychology and Education, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany. Electronic address: oliver.wilhelm@uni-ulm.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To reach high vaccination rates against COVID-19, children and adolescents should be also vaccinated. To improve childhood vaccination rates and vaccination readiness, parents need to be addressed since they decide about the vaccination of their children. We adapted the 7C of vaccination readiness scale to measure parents' readiness to vaccinate their children and evaluated the scale in a long and a short version in two studies. The study was first evaluated with a sample of N = 244 parents from the German COVID-19 Snapshot Monitoring (COSMO) and validated with N = 464 parents from the Danish COSMO. The childhood 7C scale showed acceptable to good psychometric properties in both samples and explained more than 80% of the variance in vaccination intentions. Additionally, differences in parents' readiness to vaccinate their children against COVID-19 were strongly determined by their readiness to vaccinate themselves, explaining 64% of the variance. Vaccination readiness and intentions for children changed as a function of the children's age explaining 93% of differences between parents in their vaccination intentions for their children. Finally, we found differences in correlations of components with self- versus childhood vaccination, as well as between the children's age groups in the prediction of vaccination intentions. Thus, parents need to be targeted in specifically tailored ways, based on the age of their child, to reach high vaccination rates in children. The scale is publicly available in several languages (www.vaccination-readiness.com).

Indexed as

COVID-19AdolescentChildFamilyHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansIntentionParentsVaccinationChildhood vaccinationCOVID-19Parents questionnaireQuestionnaireVaccination readinessVaccine acceptance

Identifiers

PMID35623906
PMCPMC9069251

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.