Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623751›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Evaluating the impact of a maternity and neonatal emergencies education programme in Australian regional and rural health services on clinician knowledge and confidence: a pre-test post-test study.

Meabh Cullinane, Stefanie A Zugna, Helen L McLachlan, Michelle S Newton, Della A Forster

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Meabh CullinaneJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia m.cullinane@latrobe.edu.au.ORCID 0000-0003-4947-1826
Stefanie A ZugnaJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-9259-8948
Helen L McLachlanJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-5101-9842
Michelle S NewtonJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5522-0831
Della A ForsterJudith Lumley Centre, School of Nursing and Midwifery, La Trobe University, Bundoora, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6083-087X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionAlmost 78 000 women gave birth in the state of Victoria, Australia, in 2019. While most births occurred in metropolitan Melbourne and large regional centres, a significant proportion of women birthed in rural services. In late 2016, to support clinicians to recognise and respond to clinical deterioration, the Victorian government mandated provision of an emergency training programme, called Maternity and Newborn Emergencies (MANE), to rural and regional maternity services across the state. This paper describes the evaluation of MANE. DESIGN AND

settingA quasi-experimental study design was used; the Kirkpatrick Evaluation Model provided the framework.

participantsParticipants came from the 17 rural and regional Victorian maternity services who received MANE in 2018 and/or 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES: Baseline data were collected from MANE attendees before MANE delivery, and at four time points up to 12 months post-delivery. Clinicians' knowledge of the MANE learning objectives, and confidence ratings regarding the emergencies covered in MANE were evaluated. The Safety Attitudes Questionnaire (SAQ) assessed safety climate pre-MANE and 6 months post-MANE among all maternity providers at the sites.

resultsImmediately post-MANE, most attendees reported increased confidence to escalate clinical concerns (n=251/259). Knowledge in the non-technical and practical aspects of the programme increased. Management of perinatal emergencies was viewed as equally stressful pre-MANE and post-MANE, but confidence to manage these emergencies increased post-delivery. Pre-MANE SAQ scores showed consistently strong and poor performing services. Six months post-MANE, some services showed improvements in SAQ scores indicative of improved safety climate.

conclusionMANE delivery resulted in both short-term and sustained improvements in knowledge of, and confidence in, maternity emergencies. Further investigation of the SAQ across Victoria may facilitate identification of services with a poor safety climate who could benefit from frequent targeted interventions (such as the MANE programme) at these sites.

Indexed as

EmergenciesRural Health ServicesFemaleHumansInfant, NewbornParturitionPregnancyRural PopulationVictoriamaternal medicinemedical education & trainingobstetrics

Identifiers

PMID35623751
PMCPMC9150162

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.