Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35623747›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Assessing knowledge, acceptability and social implications of a peer-to-peer HIV self-testing kit distribution model among adolescents aged 15-24 in Zambia and Uganda-HISTAZU: a mixed-method study protocol.

Andrew Sentoogo Ssemata, Chiti Bwalya, Richard Muhumuza, Denis Ndekezi, Madalitso Mbewe, Musonda Simwinga, Virginia Bond, Janet Seeley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
0.1field-weighted citation impact, top 59% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Andrew Sentoogo SsemataSocial Aspects of Health Across the Life Course, MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Wakiso, Uganda andrewssemata@yahoo.co.uk.ORCID 0000-0003-0060-0842
Chiti BwalyaZambart, University of Zambia-Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-6110-0019
Richard MuhumuzaSocial Aspects of Health Across the Life Course, MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Wakiso, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-9931-7600
Denis NdekeziSocial Aspects of Health Across the Life Course, MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Wakiso, Uganda.
Madalitso MbeweZambart, University of Zambia-Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.
Musonda SimwingaZambart, University of Zambia-Ridgeway Campus, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-0684-6897
Virginia BondZambart, University of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.ORCID 0000-0002-6815-4239
Janet SeeleySocial Aspects of Health Across the Life Course, MRC/UVRI and LSHTM Uganda Research Unit, Entebbe, Wakiso, Uganda.ORCID 0000-0002-0583-5272
University of Zambia · ZMUganda Virus Research Institute · UGLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GBMakerere University · UG

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_UU_00027/4Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionHIV self-testing (HIVST) across sub-Saharan African countries may be acceptable as it overcomes significant barriers to clinic-based HIV testing services such as privacy and confidentiality. There are a number of suggested HIVST distribution models. However, they may not be responsive to the testing service needs of adolescents and young people (AYP). We will investigate the knowledge, acceptability and social implications of a peer-to-peer distribution model of HIVST kits on uptake of HIV prevention including pre-exposure prophylaxis, condoms, and voluntary medical male circumcision and testing services and linkage to anti-retroviral therapy among AYP aged 15-24 in Zambia and Uganda. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: We will conduct an exploratory mixed methods study among AYP aged 15-24 in Uganda and Zambia. Qualitative data will be collected using audio-recorded in-depth interviews (IDIs), focus group discussions (FGDs), and participant observations. All IDIs and FGDs will be transcribed verbatim, coded and analysed through a thematic-content analysis. The quantitative data will be collected through a structured survey questionnaire derived from the preliminary findings of the qualitative work and programme evaluation quantitative data collected on uptake of services from a Zambian trial. The quantitative phase will evaluate the number of AYP reached and interested in HIVST and the implication of this on household social relations and social harms. The quantitative data will be analysed through bivariate analyses. The study will explore any social-cultural and study design barriers or facilitators to uptake of HIVST. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: This study is approved by the Uganda Virus Research Institute Research and Ethics committee, Uganda National Council for Science and Technology, University of Zambia Biomedical Ethics Committee, Zambia National Health Research Authority and the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine. Dissemination activities will involve publications in peer-reviewed journals, presentations at conferences and stakeholder meetings in the communities.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsSelf-TestingAdolescentHumansMaleResearch DesignUgandaZambiaHIV & AIDSPRIMARY CAREPUBLIC HEALTHQUALITATIVE RESEARCHQuality in health care

Identifiers

PMID35623747
PMCPMC9150152
OpenAlexW4281615748

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.